Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />:c~f~,e 1'I.vO <br /> <br />Nlinu);es of Hee;ulfrl" COD. nil }"'lL~l:.~lrrp; <br /> <br />Sep.~~ 13;) 19t-5 <br /> <br />Control Duta hoed <br />Mayor Aennedy surgested that bner. Lund check into the uriginal <br />recommendations concerning tile constirllC'Gion of this l'ond and note any <br />qualificat ions cancer niag tile drainage ma tter. Nfat;ter referred to <br />Ji:ngl'. Lund. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Uniform Building Code <br />'cTler;[ Lol'l'aine Stromquist informed t!1e Council thrd; Clay r:elley, <br />Building Insp., has reviewed the Uniform HC!ilding COC:G :uld b..as ,... 0" <br />it his app:eov:Jl. Moyor Aennedy reqL\ests"j tn.S 0:'.6)'0 'G.:; cc:ntact <br />V_l'gil l\.eller~ Hoating Insp., for his op:1.nion. <br /> <br />Atty.. Courtney stated that he believes portions of the Uniform Eldg. <br />Code Are inconsistent with our present'code and he had so noted. <br /> <br />. I <br />De Costl:1' ~lesoning Matter <br />AG:tY~'C'ciurtney reported as written in his letter, dated Sp'pt, 13, 19658 <br />that there is a discrepancy in the legal description of the property <br />near Red Fox hoad, adjacent to the Zilliox property for which a request <br />had been submitted for rezoning. He informed the Council thct 1~. <br />De Coster has sta'bed 'bha.t tne error is in the petition. Atty. Courtney <br />recon~euded that the signers be informed of this error. <br /> <br />A tt:r. Cour'Gney informed the COU~I cil the t s sketch drawn to seale was <br />submitted in lieu of a survey; he recoLnnended and the Bouncil a8reed <br />that this sketch is probably sufficient to present to the Planning <br />COL.mission, but a survey should be submitted for the public hearlng. <br />Ma'tter referred to 'bhe Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Minnesota Planuing Act <br />Trustee Neth.,rcu'j; recommended .that copies of tt." IElm. Planning Ac.t <br />be referred to Atty. COlU.'tney to study and cbeal: possible variancos <br />wi'Gh the Arden Hills procedul'es. Matter refEl'red to !d;ty. Court!18Y< <br /> <br />Zoning Ordinance Stud~ <br />Mayor Kennedy reminde the Council that t!le nex.t join'G Planning <br />Commission and COQ~cil meeting will p~obably be the final meetinz on <br />the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Report No.3 <br />Report No. 3, which'bas been a~roved by the Planning Corumission~ <br />was referred to Atty. Courtney. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ltEPORT OF IDIGR. L~ <br /> <br />T.ll. 1O~62 <br />Clerk read a letter, dated Se~t. 1. 1905, from the State Highway Dept. <br />whioh notified us that S.T.H. 10 from Hwy. 96 to County ~oad E and <br />County Road E from its junotion with old Hwy. 51 to Hamline Avenue <br />is no longer needed by the State and will revert back to the Village <br />effective November 1. 1965. . <br /> <br />Clerk informed the Council that she had talked with i'llI'. Snykero! <br />hamsey County. The Counoil requested the Clerk to request representsp <br />tion from Ramsey County at the next Coulcil meeting to discuss the <br />possibility of the County taking over these portions of roads. The <br />Council also discussed the Coul,ty taking ovel' that pOl"Gion of COlln'j;y <br />hoad E from Hamline Avenue to Lexington Avmue. <br /> <br />hEPORT OF BUILDUG INSP. .cLAY .KELLEY <br /> <br />Construction without Permits <br />Clay Kelley was not present, but the Coullcil rec,uested the Clerk to <br />check with him on the status of the three buildinrs which were con= <br />structed without pe~its. <br /> <br />REPORT OF TERAS. WORTH: ltl!:AD <br /> <br />Finance Meeting <br />Mr. Read, Ghai~an of the Finance Conwittee, requested a joint meetp <br />ing with the Council to discuss the budget. The Council agreed to <br />meet with the Committee at the Village Hall on Monday, October 4. <br /> <br />,-2~ <br />