My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-11-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 05-11-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:52 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:38:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Arden Hills Council " Ap);il 27, 1992 . <br /> 0 <br /> Mayo); Sathe); added that stre~ts are actually walked and <br /> pcioritized eve);y th);ee yea);s to determine how best to use <br /> che available funds. <br /> councilmembe); Malone reported that although the Council is <br /> still involved in debating the issue of whethe); and when to <br /> );epai); 0); );econstruct West Round Lake Road and Dunlap. <br /> consensus of Council is that bids are expected to be very <br /> competitive this yea); and they would favo); accomplishing all <br /> three this yea); if possible given the funding constraints. <br /> However, Tiller Lane will probably be the first priority of <br /> the three streets unde); consideration. <br /> Questlon/comment: Is it possible to extend the Tiller Lane <br /> assessmen"t to a ten-year term? What procedure is to be <br /> followed to object to the assessment? <br /> Attorney Filla advised that anyone who wishes to object. or <br /> anyone who is unsure now but may wish to object. must do so <br /> in Jriting this evening by simply pJ:oviding the City with a <br /> statement that they wish to object along with an addJ:ess and <br /> signature. <br /> Public heaJ:ing was closed at 8:37 p.m. . <br /> Councilmembe); Mahowald asked the engineeJ:s if there are any <br /> substantive differences between upper and lower Tiller lane. <br /> Maure); stated that there are slight differences but the <br /> entire road needs to be reconstructed to make it <br /> structurally sound. MaureJ: added that in his pJ:ofessional <br /> opinion it would not be economically wise to overlay any <br /> portion of Tiller Lane; it would be most cost effective to <br /> reconstJ:uct the enti);e J:oad. <br /> Councilmember Hicks asked if the assessment J:ol1 would be <br /> affected if the assessment fo); the two cOJ:ne); lots were <br /> changed OJ: the Abrahamson propeJ:ty were excluded. He also <br /> aSKed the engineer's opinion regarding the condition of <br /> CaJ:lton Road. Maurer answe);ed that the assessment roll was <br /> p);epared assuming the Ab);ahamson pJ:opeJ:ty would be excluded. <br /> but if the assessment fOJ: the two cOJ:neJ: lots weJ:e changed. <br /> the City's sha);e of the p);oject would be affected. <br /> Regarding Ca);lton Road. Maurer said the condition is such <br /> t.hat it will need to be addressed in the nea); futuJ:e. <br /> council discussed whetheJ: it may be app);opJ:iate to extend <br /> the assessment for Tiller Lane more than five years. GJ:aham <br /> stated that ln the past. if the assessments were laJ:ge. the . <br /> t.enn was extended an additional thJ:ee yeaJ:s. <br /> p.~ttot"ney Filla commented ....1~..... ~ Council should addJ:ess the <br /> ........O'l <br /> objections received this evening: 1 \ Whethe); the AbJ:ahamson <br /> ~ J <br /> ---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.