CCP 07-13-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~------ ----.- planning Ccmnission Meeting 6 7-01-92 ClISE #92-12 (CXlNl"DI The Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated the . proposed division would be necessary to facilitate the sale of the property . To date, the future owner has not been determined. He reported the existing development on Parcel is setback from the proposed dividing line more than the minimums required. The SUl:di vision Ordinance allows park dedication for Cammercial/Industrial development up to a maximum of 10 percent. If this division were to be treated as most residential sub::livisions are, only that portion of the total area not already developed would be used to calculate park dedication requirements . In this case, Parcel B containing 8.15 a=es would be used to determine the amount of park dedication. If the Park & Recreation Commission and Council determine that dedication of land is appropriate, Bergly suggested consideration of land west of the large wetland and adjoining the present trail easement. This area is heavily wooded, has steep slopes and is remote and probably not usable for buildings or parking. Bergly explained that in the year-end "UndevelOped Land" report, this unused portion of the Alpo site is shown as a site f= potential industrial development and anticipate the division and development likely to follow. He stated the south property line indicates a slight dis=epancy between the written legal description and the locations of existing lot corner monuments. On the north edge of the total property, the 1/2 section plat indicates a separate 110 foot wide parcel - this . separate parcel was not included in the legal description given to the surveyors. Both of these matters will be resolved in the final documents that will be filed with the County. Planner Bergly concluded to J;'econnnend approval with the following conditions: 1. The final documents to be filed address the two issues discussed in the above paragraph. 2. The park dedication requirements be determined and either 3. dedicated along with the division or paid prio~~J.~oo ~ The city Engineer determine if any additional 1 are required. 4. The owner is aware that special permits may be required for any changes to or w=k around the wetlands. 5. The debris and the junked appliance on the site be removed. 6. The city Attorney approve the final lot division documents prior to filing. ~ 1. O~~ Chair Probs ed if there were any questions or comments from the floor. There was discussion regarding park dedication of the property. Winiecki moved, seconded by McGraw that Conunission recammend to Council approval of Case #92-12i Minor SUl:division/Lot Split, 4251 . Fernwocxi Avenue North, Alpo Pet Foods (Mike Nordstrom, Gl:'ant Met) with the 6 conditions listed in Planner Berg1y's report with the 7th condition to show proof of the title and abstract of the property to the city Attorney . Motion carried unanilnously. (5-0) -