My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-13-1992
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCP 04-13-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:58 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 2:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> .. This reconstruction project would provide a 36 foot wide street improvement with concrete curb <br /> I and gutter meeting 9 ton design standards along the current alignment. This cost would be <br /> significantly increased to meet M.S.A.S. standards to provide a 4 lane roadway with a center <br /> I median to serve growth as detailed in the Gateway Business Area Comprehensive Plan. State <br /> I standards would require a 50 foot wide street improvement to construct a 4 lane collector street <br /> improvement with a median. <br /> I <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST <br /> I OPTION 3 - RECYCLING EXISTING PAVEMENT <br /> FOLLOWED BY BITUMINOUS OVERLAY <br /> I Estimated Street Improvement Cost $ 70,200 <br /> Estimated Stonn Sewer Cost S. !JlQQ <br /> t' Estimated Construction Cost $ 74,200 <br /> I Administration, Engineering, Fiscal (32%) S. 23.700 <br /> Estimated Total Project Cost $ 97,900 <br /> I This CIR project would pulverize the existing surface, add emulsion, grade and compact the <br /> I surface and place a 2" bituminous overlay. This estimated construction is based on soliciting bids <br /> I for the project, as Ramsey County would not be able to include this project in their 1992 <br /> construction schedule. <br /> I Based on the facts that future development will alter the roadway alignment, the uncertainty of <br /> I when development will occur, the need for an immediate solution and the significantly higher cost <br /> I. of reconstruction over CIR improvements, we recommend that a CIR project be constructed at this <br /> time as the most reasonable alternative. <br /> I 10 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.