Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Arden Hi 11 s Counci 1 11 June 8, 1992 <br /> <br />to amend the moratorium rather than excluding portions of <br />the City. <br /> <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to direct the Planning <br />Commission to conduct a public hearing at their next <br />meeting (July 1, 1992) to consider a City-wide <br />development moratorium; with provisions which enable <br />Council to make amendments, at their discretion, on a <br />case-by-case basis. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />CASE #92-06 SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br />AMOCO OIL COMPANY <br />lJJl.E3I'1EST _90UNTY ROAD E <br /> <br />Council had received written request from Theodore Brausen <br />to defer action on Case No. 92-06, (Special Use Permit for <br />Amoco Oil Co. at 1306 West County Road E) to the July 13, <br />1992 regular Council meeting. <br /> <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to defer Case 92-06 to <br />July 13, 1992. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. CASE #92-11 SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br />TWIN CITY ~~T SUPPLY <br />12l~RED FOX ROAD <br /> <br />City Planner Bergly advised that Twin City Pet Supply has <br />requested a special use permit to allow sale of pet <br />supplies, and allow club meetings, seminars, and dog <br />training at their store at 1212 Red Fox Road in the B-4 <br />district. <br /> <br />Bergly reported that the Planning Commission conducted a <br />public hearing on this application at their June 3, 1992 <br />meeting, where they recommended approval with the conditions <br />that 1) The City be allowed to review the operation in one <br />year, 2) The applicant provide a copy of the lease and <br />evidence of title, and 3) The applicant comply with any <br />stipulations of the Fire Marshall. <br /> <br />Councilmember Mahowald questioned whether it may be <br />appropriate to limit how long the special use permit would <br />be allowed. Attorney Filla advised that the nature of a <br />special use permit is that it runs with the land rather than <br />with the tenant, therefore, a new tenant could use the <br />property in the same way if conditions of the special use <br />permit were met. <br /> <br />. The applicant, Letty Afong, owner of Twin City Pet Supply, <br />was present and Attorney Filla advised that the proof of <br />ownership received with the application is not adequate; <br />that current proof of ownership would be required as a <br />