CCP 08-17-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Planning CaImission Meeting 3 8-05-92 PUBLIC HEl\RING CASE #92-14 (CXlNl'INUED): . Carlson moved, Petersen seconded, to waive the Development Moratorium for Case #92-14, SUP for Home Occupation, Ms. Cynthia Garretson, 3966 Glenview Avenue. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . There was discussion of the hair salon bJsiness days and hours. Piotrowski arrived at the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Mdkaw moved, seconded by Petersen to approve Case #92-14, SUP for Home Occupation, Cynthia Garretson, 3966 Glenview Avenue, with the conditions listed in Planner Bergly's report dated August 5, 1992, with the addition of Condition No.7: The bJsiness lllUSt close at 7: 00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Motion carried unaniloously. (6-0) . PllBLIC HEl\RING - CASE #92-15: SUP 1\MENtMENT AND A HEIGRr Vl\RIllN::E. 3900 BEl'HEL IIUVE. BEl'HEL mT.T.mF. Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m.; Case #92-15, SUP Amenchnent and a Height Variance for the Community Life Center (Auditorium), 3900 Bethel Drive, Bethel College. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briohton Bulletin on Wednesday, July . 22, 1992, and mailed to affected property owners on Friday, July 17, 1992. Planner Bergly referred to his report dated August 5, 1992, and explained an SUP was granted f= a caJ1plS Master Plan in 1981, with the stipulation that development proposals that are consistent with the approved Master Plan will require only site plan approval. This proposal generally conforms with the Master Plan, however, due to a reconfiguration of the Footprint (a rectangular bl=k was shown on the Master Plan), an increase in the footprint area of approx:iJnately 25 percent, and a higher wilding than was initially envisioned, staff recommends that this substantial addition to the caJ1plS be treated as an SUP Amenchnent with a height variance. The proposed Community Life Center will be a major performing arts center in the '!Win cities area (capacity of 1,800). Visually it will be a dominant focal point on the caJ1plS. Functionally, it will be tied directly to the academic "cluster" in the central caJ1plS area. Exposure to the City street system will be from Old Snelling a=oss Valentine Lake. The request is for approval of the SUP A1nendment and approval of a height variance of 40 feet (35 feet allowed; 75 feet is proposed) . The Planner reviewed the issues listed in his report as follows: 1. Buildincl Location/Reconfimnation: The approved Master Plan . irilicates the schematic b..1ilding nearer to Valentine Lake than present shoreline setbacks allow. This requires either a sh=eline setback variance or adjusting the b.lllding location when the b..1ilding plans are finalized. The college chose the later as the l1lOr", acceptable approach. The reconfiguration from a rectangular b.lllding to an irregular shape to reflect interi=