CCP 12-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

p~ n. .....; ",..ion Meetincr 2 12-02-92 . 2. Conduct an infontal hearing to discuss all Zoning Code amendments. 3. Corxiuct an official public hearing to n;......ISS the proposed Zoning' Code amendments in lieu of infonnal hearings. If Council prefers an official public hearing should it be held at Planning or Council meeting . Canunission also requeste:i that Planner Bergly be authorize:i to prepare a diagram showing the area on which Recreational Vehicle parking would be allowe:i for residential properties (ie: the J:W.lding envelope as defined by setbacks) . After a brief recess, Camnission reconvened for their regular meeting at 7:48 p.m. 1u-~J<UVJ:i MINUTES Winiecki moved, seconde:i by piotrowski, to approve the November 4. 1992 Planning Minutes as sul:rnitte:i. All voted in favor. (6-0) Cl\SE #92-21: IJJr cc::p:;m.TnlI.TION AND MIIOl. SUBDIVISION - CXI!ll'ROL DATA SYS'l'EMS. IN:. 4201 LEXIml'CN AVENUE H:Rl'H Planner Bergly referre:i to his report dated December 2, 1992, relating to the applicant's request to consolidate parcels CM11ed by Control Data Systems, Inc., as identifie:i on the plat and in a 'Written legal . description, and then re-Qivisions of the consolidated tract into 3 parcels, as shown on the "lDt Consolidation/Subdivision Plan". '!he 3 resulting parcels have the following sizes (without streets) : Parcel A: 4.69 Ac (NSP sub-station) i Parcel B: 8.73 Ac (Potential development site - now vacant); Parcel C: 41.57 Ac (contains the north wing of Control Data systems hlilding. The major purpose of the proposal is to create Parcel B so it can be develope:1 as a single parcel. Bergly reviewed the findings listed in his report and explaine:i the old description of the NSP sub-station is separated from new Parcel B by a 33 foot wide strip owned by Control Data. '!his strip was presumably not include:i in the original sub-station tract so it could be use:i as the south 1/2 of a future 66 foot street. SUch a street is not neede:i for development of Parcel B nor for use by the substation. Previous divisions and transfer of 3 parcels generally located north of the central and west portions of Parcel B are not included in the proposed consolidation and'minor sub:livision. '!be Planner reconnnende:i the applicant sul:rnit this to the County for filing as a plat to allow these parcels to have lot mnnbers instead of lengthy legal descriptionsi this would allow a cleaner definition of the property. Bergly noted there are three ponding areas shown on the property to be . divide:ii one on the sub-station loti one near the NE corner of Parcel overlapping both Parcel A and Bi one in the east central area of Parcel C. These three wetlands and possibly others will need to be delineated on the ground. by a qualifie:i wetland delineator and shown on the plat a=rding to RCWD regulations, together with any utility and drainage easements . m ---- - ----------