CCP 12-14-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

plannincr co. ..... i ....ion Meet:in:l 2 12-02-92 . 2. Conduct an informal hearing to r1i<:rllSS all Zoning Code amendments. 3. Conduct an official public hearing to discuss the proposed zoning Code amendments in lieu of informal hearings. If Council prefers an official public hearing should it be held at Planning or Council meeting . Connnission also requested that Planner Bergly be authorized to prepare a diagram showing the area on which Recreational Vehicle parking would be allowed for residential properties (ie: the b.rilding envelope as defined by setbacks) . After a brief recess, Connnission reconvened for their regular meeting at 7:48 p.m. APPROVE MINU'l'!S Winiecki moved, seconded by piotrowski, to approve the November 4. 1992 Planning Minutes as sul:mitted. All voted in favor. (6-0) Cl\SE #92-21: IDr a:HlOLTnld'ICN AND MIN:R SUBDIVISICN - 0ClN1'R0L mTA SYSTlHl. DC. 4201 I.EXI!Gl'Ctl' AVENUE K:Rl'H Planner Bergly referred to his report dated December 2, 1992, relating to the applicant's request to consolidate parcels c:JNI1€d by Control Data Systems, Inc., as identified on the plat am in a written legal . description, am then re-divisions of the consolidated tract into 3 parcels, as shown on the "Lot Consolidation/SUbdivision Plan". '!he 3 resulting parcels have the following sizes (without streets): Parcel A: 4.69 Ac (NSP sub-station); Parcel B: 8.73 Ac (Potential development site - now vacant); Parcel C: 41.57 Ac (Contains the north wing of Control Data Systems b.rilding. The major purpose of the proposal is to create Parcel B so it can be developed as a single parcel. Bergly reviewed the firrlings listed in his report am e}Q:Jlained the old description of the NSP sub-station is separated fram new Parcel B by a 33 foot wide strip c:JNI1€d by Control Data. This strip W<iS presumably not included in the original sub-station tract so it could be used as the south 1/2 of a future 66 foot street. SUch a street is not n""""M for development of Parcel B nor for use by the substation. Previous divisions am transfer of 3 parcels generally located north of the central am west portions of Parcel B are not included in the proposed consolidation am minor subdivision. The Planner recornmerrled the applicant sul:mit this to the County for filing as a plat to allow these parcels to have lot numbers instead of l~y legal descriptions; this would allow a cleaner definition of the property. Bergly noted there are three ponding areas shown on the property to be . dividedi one on the sub-station lot; one near the NE =er of Parcel overlapping both Parcel A am Bi one in the east central area of Parcel C. These three wetlands am possibly others will need to be delineated on the ground by a qualified wetland delineator am shown on the plat according to RCWO regulations, together with any utility am drainage easements .