Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 8: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY — MAXIMUM DENSITY SCENARIO WITH DISCOUNT RETAIL <br />ITE <br />Intensity <br />AM Peak Hour <br />PM Peak Hour <br />Land Use Description <br />LUC <br />/ Units <br />Daily <br />In <br />Out <br />Total <br />In <br />Out <br />Total <br />Senior Adult Attached Housing <br />252 <br />Un 0 <br />486 <br />10 <br />20 <br />30 <br />21 <br />17 <br />38 <br />ts <br />Condominium/Townhome <br />230 <br />300 <br />1,032 <br />30 <br />102 <br />132 <br />77 <br />31 <br />108 <br />Units <br />Rental Townhome <br />215 <br />725 <br />5,220 <br />87 <br />261 <br />348 <br />244 <br />169 <br />413 <br />Units <br />005 <br />Apartments <br />220 <br />8 <br />5,392 <br />77 <br />243 <br />320 <br />257 <br />151 <br />408 <br />Single Family Detached <br />210 <br />525 <br />4,951 <br />92 <br />276 <br />368 <br />311 <br />183 <br />494 <br />Units <br />Shopping Center <br />820 <br />390 kSF <br />14,434 <br />203 <br />124 <br />328 <br />636 <br />690 <br />1,326 <br />General Office <br />710 <br />1700 kSF <br />18,428 <br />2,274 <br />310 <br />2,584 <br />416 <br />2,032 <br />2,448 <br />Building Warehousing <br />150 <br />250 kSF <br />428 <br />33 <br />10 <br />43 <br />13 <br />32 <br />45 <br />Wholesale Retail <br />813 <br />160 kSF <br />8,083 <br />167 <br />131 <br />298 <br />339 <br />353 <br />693 <br />Gross Development Trips <br />58,454 <br />2,973 <br />1,477 <br />4,451 <br />2,314 <br />3,658 <br />5,973 <br />Multi -Use Reduction (15%) <br />-8,768 <br />-446 <br />-222 <br />-668 <br />-347 <br />-549 <br />-896 <br />Net Development Trips <br />49,686 <br />2,527 <br />1,255 <br />3,783 <br />1,967 <br />3,109 <br />5,077 <br />4.4 PROPOSED TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT <br />The distribution of site traffic for the proposed development onto the surrounding roadway network was <br />based on review of the study area, turning movement counts, the 2014 AUAR Traffic Analysis, and the <br />2024 Rice Creek Commons Traffic Impact Study. The distribution applied is similar to the two <br />aforementioned traffic studies, with one notable change. Based on the likelihood of some level of <br />congestion at the three County Road H intersections, it is believed that slightly more trips would utilize <br />the south TCAAP site access than was previously estimated, and therefore 5% of the traffic originating <br />from the south along 1-35W was shifted from the north access to the south access. As a result, 55% of the <br />total site trips would utilize the north site access and 45% would utilize the south site access, as opposed <br />to the previous 60%/40% split between the two accesses. <br />Site traffic was assigned to/from the site using the same global distribution as the 2014 AUAR and the Rice <br />Creek Commons Traffic Study with the exception of the changes described above. The following overall <br />global distribution was applied: <br />• 25% to/from the north on 1-35W <br />• 25% to/from the south on 1-35W <br />• 20% to/from the east on CSAH 96 <br />• 10% to/from the north on Mounds View Boulevard <br />• 10% to/from the north on Old US Highway 8 <br />• 5% to/from the west on County Road H <br />TCAAP AUAR Update I Traffic Analysis <br />April 2024 <br />