Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -..---- <br /> Plarming Minutes Page 4 04/20/94 . <br /> sign can be redesigned within the frame to include everyone, <br /> Chair Winiecki asked how the 3' x 3' size sign was decided upon. <br /> Mr. Piirainen stated it was a formula used by sign carpanies, along with <br /> other clinics, to determine what size a sign should be. <br /> Chair Winiecki thought it was a busy sign. and the building sign was <br /> highly visible. <br /> Mr, Piirainen stated the landlord wanted separate identification for the <br /> medical clinic and the retail section of the plaza, <br /> Chair Winiecki stated an arraN =uld serve the pu:rp:>se. If this one <br /> tenant takes up the whole allowance for signage, other tenants =uld <br /> find a problem with their lack of signage. <br /> Mr. Erickson stated if one f=t were rerroved fran the sign, it =uld be <br /> in ccmpliance. <br /> Chair Winiecki stated the main objective of the sign is for people to be . <br /> able to find the plaza and know where to turn into the lot, <br /> Mr. Carlson thought t= parking signs =u1d be redundant and confusing <br /> for customers, <br /> Chair Winiecki asked the applicant to reduce the size of the sign to <br /> enable other tenants to have signage possibilities. <br /> Mr. Piirainen thought the elimination of the extra parking sign was <br /> acceptable. <br /> piotrowski rrotioned, seconded by Carlson, to deny the request for <br /> the sign variance and for the tenant to reduce the height and <br /> square f=tage of the sign. The rrotion passed unanirrousl y, (6-0) <br /> Chair Winiecki stated the issue should be brought before Council at the <br /> next meeting. <br /> Mr, piirainen stated he =uld =rk with the sign corrpany on the issue, <br /> . <br />