Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . CITY OF ARmN HILI8 <br /> MEHlRANIJlIol <br /> DATE: February 25, 1994 <br /> TO: Dorothy Person, City }\t'lmini strat= <br /> FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public tm"ks SUperintendent .0 ~J . <br /> stm.JEl:'l' : r'rnm<>r:lts an stop sign policy as proposed by the Public Works <br /> Ccmni.ttee. <br /> While I appreciate the efforts of the Public W::lrks/Safety Ccmnittee to <br /> address this issue, I believe that the process as outlined nay be a bit <br /> cumbersome to administer, and offer the follCMing ccmrents. <br /> Even though the policy was written because of a stop sign installation <br /> request it seems that this procedure could be used for all traffic sign <br /> installations or rerrovals. <br /> A request by Council to add or rerrove a sign should be included to the <br /> policy . <br /> . I also have concerns ab:Jut section B under procedures. I do not believe <br /> it is necessary to always conduct a poll of the affected residents or <br /> businesses. The Public Works Superintendent should be able to review <br /> the needs and =iteria necessary to install or rerrove a sign. Part of <br /> the review nay include notifying some affected property CMI1ers if some <br /> opposition can be detected. If necessary, the Superintendent can review <br /> the issues with other staff members, and/= the City Administrator to <br /> help make a final reccmrendation. The City Administrator can rrake an <br /> independent review to verify facts. If the requesting parties are not <br /> satisfied with staffs final decision, than an appeal should go to <br /> Council. <br /> m:to <br /> . <br />