My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-23-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCP 05-23-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:09:50 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 3:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> -------------------- <br /> p <br /> Arden Hills Council 4 May 9, 1994 <br /> MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Probst to inform the . <br /> National Guard that the City of Arden Hills is <br /> willing to participate in a cost sharing agreement <br /> with them to install a sewer connection at Highway <br /> 96 and Hamline Avenue, contingent upon the ability <br /> of the City to share in a combined maintenance <br /> facility on this property. In addition, in the <br /> absence of not being able to obtain the shared <br /> maintenance facility, the National Guard would <br /> become the full user of the utilities, and would be <br /> assessed the total cost of the utilities. Motion <br /> carried unanimously (5-0J . <br /> CELLULAR ONE ANTENNA CHANGF. REOUEST <br /> Community Planning Coordinator Fritsinger noted that the <br /> staff was requesting clarification as to the direction <br /> the staff should take to address the request from the <br /> applicant to make changes to their existing antenna <br /> located on the City's water tower. <br /> Cellular One had submitted a proposal to replace the <br /> existing antenna with an eleven foot two inch (11' 2") <br /> antenna. <br /> In reviewing the file, it was noted that the SUP process . <br /> had not previously taken place. A lease agreement which <br /> included the terms for construction and placement of the <br /> antenna was negotiated with the City. In reviewing the <br /> ordinance, it was clear that an SUP was needed. The City <br /> Attorney did clarify that this would be the correct <br /> procedure to follow. <br /> The applicant had identified a willingness to pursue the <br /> SUP process, however, there are some time constraints in <br /> meeting the deadline in replacing the antenna. <br /> Malone commented that in order to properly handle the <br /> request, he agreed that the SUP process was appropriate, <br /> He further noted that the City had a lease agreement with <br /> the applicant which allows them use of the tower for <br /> which the City receives income. In addition, the lease <br /> agreement allows the applicant to make changes to the <br /> antenna located on the tower. Malone would like to find <br /> a way to authorize the applicant to proceed with the <br /> lease hold improvements while pursuing the Special Use <br /> Permit process. He further noted that the applicant did <br /> make a request to the City for these changes on March 30, <br /> 1994. This application could have been placed as an <br /> agenda item at the May Planning Commission meeting. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.