CCP 04-20-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I DRAFT . I Amil Planning Minutes - Page 2 04/05/95 I Mr. Bergly stated both sites created by the proposed division exceed minimum standards for lot area and lot width. He indicated parking and open space requirements are the same as Parcel A after I division as on the total Control Data parcel before division and will be addressed for Parcel B development in the Site Plan Review. Mr. Bergly indicated the second stage development will provide a plat which includes street and park I dedication. Due to the involvement of Control Data with the Parcel A street dedication/park dedication; the division of Parcel B; and the related issues of parking and open space, a POO may be I an appropriate procedure for the second stage. Mr. Bergly presented the Planning Commission with a revised set of recommendations. I Commissioner Carlson indicated condition number seven, would it be a binding agreement and the I applicant would be bound by the park dedication. Mr. Bergly stated that was the intent of the City Attorney, to have both the applicant and the City aware of the agreement and that all conditions would be adhered to during development. I Commissioner Nelson inquired in regards to access to Cummings Park and the proposed parking lot in the second stage. Mr. Fritsinger indicated the City has in the past used Control Data parking lot . I for access to Cummings Park and now currently has a lease agreement through December 31, 1995. He noted the Parks and Recreation Department has not yet discussed options regarding access and parking for Cummings Park. I Commissioner Larson inquired if the site as part of the second stage development will meet parking and landscaping requirements. Mr. Bergly indicated although it is not identified, the requirements I will be met in the second stage also. Commissioner Larson inquired if when the applicant presents the POO, it will include all the I properties, including all of Parcel B. Mr. Bergly stated that was correct and it is the City's intent to have the POO consist of all three parties. This will create a multi-use for multiple buildings on one site. I Commissioner Larson asked, if by giving the December 31, 1995 deadline, this was giving the authority to build the second stage without requirements. Mr. Bergly indicated there were certain I issues that could not be resolved in one month, so the applicant was given a reasonable time frame for completion of the total project. He noted the City felt they could approve the first stage if they I had control over the second stage. Mr. Fritsinger, in response to previous discussion of park dedication for point of clarification, I indicated the Planning Commission does not take action on Park Dedication that is left for the City Council negotiates that aspect of the dedication. . I I