Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> . <br /> I. E. Back2round <br /> I <br /> l. In September of 1993, the Applicant submitted a six lot POO Concept Plan <br /> review by the City Staff The staff ~ecommendation was to reduce the <br /> I number oflots to three or four, and.to use the required 60 foot radius cul- <br /> de-sac. <br /> I 2, In September of 1994, again a six lot POO was submitted for staff review. <br /> Staff recommended reducing the number oflots to five or preferably four. <br /> I , In November of 1994, (Case 94-21), the Planning Commission reviewed an <br /> ~. <br /> application for a six lot POO with virtually the same reaction as noted in <br /> the September, 1993 and 1994 staff memos. <br /> I C. Staff Recommendation <br /> I Staff recommended that the Planning Commission table application #95-16 for the <br /> Balfany Preliminary Plat, giving the Applicant specific direction on acceptable <br /> development parameters. <br /> I D. Plannin2 Commission Recommendation <br /> I. 1 The Planning Commission considered a motion to table the request and <br /> give specific direction on acceptable development parameters. However, <br /> the petitioner requested that the Planning Commission take action on their <br /> I request. Therefore, the Planning Commission took action on their request. <br /> 2. The Planning Commission recommends denial ofP1anning Case 95-16, <br /> I Balfany Preliminary Plat. The recommendation to deny the Preliminary <br /> Plat was based on: <br /> I A. Plat requires a variance to the cul-de-sac diameter; <br /> E. Lot 1 does not meet the rear yard setback requirements; and <br /> I C. All portions of Lot 25, Block 3, Rohlder's Home and Garden Acres <br /> have not been included in the plat. <br /> I <br /> I KR\jt <br /> I <br /> I . 3 <br /> I <br />