CCP 07-31-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I DRAFT - .1 PlanninlZ Minutes PalZe 4 7/05/95 I Rye inquired if the Engineer's report addressed this issue at all. Mr. Fritsinger indicated he was unsure and inquired ofthe applicant Mr. Bill Franke. I Mr. Franke, ofCSM Corporation, indicated they have not increased the impervious surface, in fact reduced some of the impervious surface with landscaping, so he did not feel there would be additional I drainage. He indicated if there were a problem or concerns that they would be willing to address this concern. Mr. Franke indicated the drainage plan has been approved by the City and is draining to the storm I sewer, he is uncertain of the direction flow after it reaches the storm sewer. He reiterated the applicant would certainly work with anyone if they are creating any additional problems. I Chair Erickson explained the pond in the plans is a sediment pond. I Mr. Ringwald indicated the records are inconclusive as to the direction flow of the storm sewer and indicated it could be checked by visually observing the manhole. I Larson indicated he did not take comfort in the fact that there would not be an increase in impervious surface, in regards to the drainage questions. He believed the drainage should be researched. el Mr. Fritsinger indicated staff can collect additional information regarding the drainage. Chair Erickson hearing no further comments, closed the Public Hearing at 8:01 p.m. I Larson inquired as to the request for subdivision, if the entire parcel is owned by CSM and parking I is combined. Mr. Ringwald indicated it was his understanding the subdivision would be two for tax purposes, but essentially it would work as one in regards to parking. Mr. Ringwald indicated that is also why he is recommending that the City Attorney to review the documents regarding the I parking lot. Larson indicated in regards to the parking, the easements would go with the property. Mr. Ringwald I indicated that would be correct, the easements would go with the overall acquisition of any building. Nelson inquired in regards to the direction of the flow of the drainage, should it be stipulated if the I flow is one way or another. Mr' Fritsinger indicated the first step would be to determine the direction of the flow and proceed from that point. I Sand moved, Larson seconded a motion to approve Case #95-15, PUD Master Plan and Final Plan at 4255/4265 Lexington Avenue North subject to the following conditions: I That the lot division be filed with Ramsey County prior to occupancy of either 1. .1 building. I