My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-14-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 08-14-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:29 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:31:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br />ARQJ;;N HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 31,1995 8 .- <br />Mr. Ringwald noted in September of 1993, the Applicant submitted a six lot PUD Concept Plan . <br />review to the City Staff. The staff recommendation was to reduce the number of lots to three or four I <br />and to use the required 60 foot radius cul-de-sac. <br />Mr. Ringwald indicated the Applicant then in September of 1994 again submitted a six lot PUD for I <br />staff review, and staff recommended reducing the number to five or preferably four. <br />Mr. Ringwald noted in November of 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed an application for I <br />a six lot PUD with virtually the same reaction as noted in September, 1993 and 1994 staff memos. <br />Mr. Ringwald indicated the staff recommended the Planning Commission table the application, I <br />giving the Applicant specific direction on acceptable development parameters. <br />Mr. Ringwald reported the Planning Commission considered a motion to table the request and give I <br />specific direction on acceptable development parameters. However, the petitioner requested that the <br />Planning Commission take action on their request. Therefore, the Planning Commission took action I <br />on their request. <br />Mr. Ringwald reported the Planning Commission recommended denial of Planning Case 95-16, -I <br />Balfany Preliminary Plat. The recommendation to deny the Preliminary Plat was based on: <br />A. Plat requires a variance to the cul-de-sac diameter. I <br />B. Lot 1 does not meet the rear yard setback requirements; and <br />C. All portions of Lot 25, Block 3, Rohlder's Home and Garden Acres have not been <br /> included in the plat. - <br />Mr. Ringwald indicated the primary concern is the radius of the cul-de-sac. <br />Mr. Ringwald informed the City Council they could approve the request, send the application back I <br />to the Planning Commission or deny the application. - <br />Mr. Ringwald noted there would be five new lots with one existing lot. <br />Mr. Ringwald indicated the primary reason for denial was staff believed there were options available I <br />for a design that would be code consistent and still establish the goals desired by the developer to <br />save trees and eliminate ejector sewer systems. I <br />Mr. Ringwald indicated the Applicant did not make a compelling argument for the tree in the island <br />of the cul-de-sac and the smaller radius. I <br /> -I <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.