My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-13-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 11-13-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:38 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I - <br /> I. - <br /> The last area to consider is the boulevard area. The width of the boulevard can vary from 10 feet to <br /> I 30 feet in an urban section and may be up to 50 feet with a rural section. The width of the boulevard <br /> will vary depending on what is placed in the boulevard area such as trails, walks, or landscaping, . <br /> I State Aid Standards require a 10-foot clearance from the driving lane when the posted speed exceeds <br /> 45 miles per hour. Ramsey County also likes to maintain 10 feet behind the curb for snow storage. ~ <br /> Potential boulevard sections are shown in Figures <br /> ~ <br /> I Based on an evaluation of the prototypical cross-sections five alternative roadway cross-sections L..' <br /> were identified as possible alternatives for Highway 96 and include~ <br /> I . 2-Lane Undivided it <br /> - <br /> . 2-Lane With Two-Way Center Left-turn Lane <br /> I . 4-Lane Undivided <br /> . 4-Lane Divided With Left-turn Lanes L.i <br /> . 4-Lane With Two-Way Center Left-turn Lane - <br /> - <br /> I These alternatives are shown on Figures -mthru ----. ' , <br /> - <br /> I ACCESS SPACING ALTERNATIVES 1: 1 <br /> - <br /> I. As discussed in an earlier section of this report, criteria were established for the location of access <br /> points on Highway 96. However, because the current access does not meet these criteria and because [11 <br /> it is necessary to'imiintain access to existing land uses it is not possible to meet the access spacing - <br /> - <br /> I criteria in every case. The affected municipalities will have considerable input into the location of <br /> access to Highway 95. For the purposes of the draft Concept Report the.consultant with input from ~ I <br /> the County have identified what they believe is the best access plan from the perspective of traffic <br /> I operations on Highway 96, In some areas thi~{'ihay create poor access for adjacent land uses and <br /> alternatives will be evaluated. ." <br /> I SIGNAL LOCATIONS ~' <br /> :-11 <br /> - <br /> The recommended plan identifies the locations where signals are being considered in the corridor. <br /> I In most cases, with the exception of Snail Lake Boulevard these potential signal locations meet the -il <br /> spacing criteria identified for the corridor. Although, the report identifies potential signal locations <br /> ,,-"" the interSections still must meet the signal warrant criteria before a signal will be installed. - <br /> I ---D <br /> REGIONAL TRAIL LOCATION .' <br /> I As discussed earlier, the Highway 96 corridor has been designated as a corridor for a regional trail. ---.il <br /> The trail could be located on either the north side or south side of the highway. <br /> I _':'1 <br /> Ie - <br /> _..Jl <br /> I 53 . , <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.