CC 05-06-1959 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 22 is $12.~O. It costs teo mUCh. A lot of people have tried that. M st of the others have been pumping at night - using a little pump and hook it up daytime and at night it goes cut in the streets. It's a very grave situation. As Mr. ~opovich said, the first meeting in 1955 we had 800 people. There was a group of 50 came, sat down together - they came to defeat the se~er because I talked to one the next day and he said after we listened tc the reasoning of Mr. Williams, because the State Beard said they couldn't open up Fairvlew unless they had a sanitary sewer, he said we decided we wouldn't cbject to it Sf they all said I came here determined tc oppose the sewer but I'm for it. I think we should give our endcrsement to the Council,support them wholeheartedly because this is a very important problem. If we don't connect to Rosevill. now we will be left cut. The cost of putting 8 separate pipe fr':m here to tle city would be tremendous so I'm for it end Ithink y"u all should support our Counci 1. ~"R. A. M. OLEN, 3270 Nt. Hamline': I'dli~e to ask Yx. Brenna what the sewer abutting charge was in the Villacje of Roseville and if it '::as in the neighborhcod of scme$8.00, I was wondering why ours vle.uld be abcut 50% greater than theirs. .lIP.. IF.ENNAN: Roseville in the beginning, if you notice, t~ok everything that was scuth of Highway 36. That was our most populated area witl;! maybe 3(,00 hornes in there. I think the estimate Wile figured out $6.50 tc :.r7.0C and it ended up, after we had gotten bids, at$6.C5 a frent fcot, but we teok in big areas. Our third area is a scattered area which will cost more. The second area will be about $7.00 and probably the last one will be the most becaEe it's less populated.