Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />. point is probably almost 200 feet that would not be subject to any <br />assessment. <br />MR. SHORT: Assessing is not always done simply by the bare <br />amount of sewer in front of the house. In other words, I think a good <br />example is the case where your sewer runs up along the block and <br />terminates at the last house. He may have 2C feet of sewer in front <br />where the neighbor may have 100 feet, both of them having 100 foot lots. <br />I think everyone will agree that his benefit , as long as the sewer <br />is extended far enough, is as great as the man next door, yet it <br />certainly wouldn't be equitable for the man to pay 10C feet of <br />frontage and the man next door 20.n think yours is a somewhat <br />similar condition. <br />"R. DOEPNER: I think despite the fact that this sewer main <br />ends about the middle of that low part of the saddle that I'm <br />still able to reach it from where my house is. <br />~H. SHORT: I would say this, that in making the assessment, <br />those facts have to be taken into account by the people making the <br />assessment. That at the time the assessment roll is published <br />and you have the opportunity to know the amount of money, if it <br />was your feeling that it was improper, that is your opportunity to <br />register ~r objections. Assessments like this are normally <br />reviewed with the Village Council so they may have an opportunity <br />to judge a number of similar problems so they can see the people <br />concerned are being treated equitably. <br />pRo DOePNER: At this time I would register in objection to <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the proposal. <br />I/PYOR ASH 3rCH: Anyone else? <br />NIL, JOHN E. DAUBNEY, 1100 Pioneer Building, Saint Paul: <br />