CC 10-14-1968 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Minutes of the Regular Council ~eetlnQ October 14, 1968 - - Page Four to Lexington Avenue to alleviate a traffic hazard which already eXists and will be compounded with the addition of 1000 additional Control Data employees, '~r. Lind agreed to do this. Mr. Brodie advised that the Planning Commission recommends that Council approve the Rul Iding Permit applied for by Control Data, as ~ presented, subject to: 1. Agreement by Control Data to meet the parking requirement of one parking space for each lt employees. (Site plan to be amended to show this added parking.) . 2, Approval of landscape plans by Planner C. Dale, 3, Approval of drainage plans by Engineer Lund. 4. Approval of building plans by Rulldlng Inspector Clay Ke Iley. Recommending that the Rul Iding Permit be issued prior to receipt of the above Items so that construction can be commenced before frost, It was moved by Councilman Crepeau that Council concur with the re- commendations of the Planning Commission as stated by "r. Brodie and outlined in the Planning Commission minutes of October 1, 1968; seconded by Counci Iman Olmen; carried. Case No. 68-36, Jerome Timm Variance, i.'r-:--BrodTe-explained that "r, Timm, applicant for the variance, Is a prospective purchasee of the property, pending the outcome of this variance request. He explained that a previous variance may have been granted to Mr, Wilsey, present owne~ of the property, br previous construction on this site, The Planning Commission recommends approval of this variance, as presented, subject to provisions possible outlined in the previous variance which was available to the Planning Commission, Mr. Wilsey state~ that a previous variance request had been made but he did not believe a formal variance was filed with the Village. Clerk offered to check this with the Village records. Bulldlng inspector Clay Kel ley stated he felt this requested proposal a definIte Improvement and therefore recommended approval. It was moved by Councilman Crepeau to approve the variance, as presented on the plan; seconded by Councilman Olmen; carried. Case No, 68-30, George Heckman Subdivision Variance A-feffer-~-dafed September 3D, 1968, from Engineer Lund, was read by Mr. Brodie In which Mr. Lund recommended that anyone building on this newly developed lot, advise Banister Engineering Co, so they can establish the proper grade for building; also that It may be diffIcult to construct a driveway on this lot along the west edge because of the rapid change In grade; that there does not appear to be any reason that would render the lot unbui Idable, ~ Mr. Brodie advIsed that after review of the survey which was submitted, It Is the recommendatIon of the Planning Commission that Council approve the subdivIsion as presented, walving the subdivIsion re- quirements; advising the applicant of the comments of the EngIneer . regarding establishing proper grade and the possibility of the difficult driveway situation; advising that a variance will not be granted in the future for construction on this property. It was moved by Councilman Crepeau that Councl I concur with the recommendations of the Planning Commission as outlined; seconded by Counci Iman Olmen; carrIed. ~~~~~~_~L~~_~~C~L~g_~~t Mr. Brodie advised that -the Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed purchase of the tot south of the Hockey rink for use as a parking lot. ~!LLL!~_s~~~~~~!~_~L!~L~_~~t~~~~_~~q~LC~~~~!~ Mr. Brodie advised that the Planning Commission recommends that utIlity easements be Included as permltted encroachments within the setback requlrements, Section 11, Paragraph 8 of the Zoning Ordinance, - 4 -