Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I< ~ <br />..:)0 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Counc~ 1 Hinu-rcs <br /> <br />- June <br /> <br />0,{i <br /><to .')' <br /> <br />1968 --. <br /> <br />cen"]- i nuec! <br /> <br />Page t\'.:o <br /> <br />Attorney Ccurtl1ey stated tha-~ Ii' depends on tile terms of the ease- <br />merIt; ~os-t owners do no.~ wailt moullds of dirt Ic11" by the contractor. <br /> <br />Mr. Ernst, representing Control Data, ~skBd how the amount to be <br />cred i~I'ed ~'la:1 estabj ished, ho~... many acres 1n 1'he pl-Ojoct and the method <br />of assessmen1-~ <br /> <br />Engineer Lund stated that he does not have the number of acres. <br /> <br />Ma)'or Bjor'ndah! informed him h would be assessed at'$10 per fl"ont~, <br />foot.f~~~~~ eL--<<.....-.. .<:rr". <br /> <br />Engineer Lund expl8ined that the credit is figured considering the <br />acreage previously assesGed. <br /> <br />Mr. Ernst inquired as to J-\OW many feot in the entire 6ssessment area. <br /> <br />Eng i neE,r Lund staored iot depands on ~ohe po Ii Cv adopted by the v i II age-- <br />whether" abutting or a trllrlc charge for the property lying north of <br />the improveme~t. There is a li-rtle over 2500 feet - 1700 feet of <br />which could be assessed B trunk charge (property not immediately <br />abutting). <br /> <br />Mr. E'"nsOr then inqulroed ,:r;,);"e iJre the additional 1700 feet. <br /> <br />Egninemr Lund stated that those <br />counci I adopts i"he impl-ovemont. <br />matters to be considered at the <br /> <br />figures are not official until the <br />He believes these questions are <br />assessmant hezl.ing. <br /> <br />Mr. Ernst inquired if a fron.~ fao"t charge was befng anticipated <br />for Control Data. <br /> <br />Eng!neel- Lund I"epiied -;-['8-;- ori1i~; '.Jould be a pl"obable trunk charge <br />of $2.50 per front foot. <br /> <br />Mayor 8joi"ndah I thon inqui ,-od if o;ohere \~ere any more questions. <br />He then requested anyone i~avlng st~-~emell"ts to ma;~o pro or con to <br />speak. <br /> <br />Mr. Ernst spoke in behalf of Coni"rot Data arid voiced OI)Posltion since <br />no benefit wi' I be received by Control Data. <br /> <br />Mr. Rei! ing stated his opfnion is -j-be same as exprossed by Ml~. Ernst. <br /> <br />Mr. Krannak stated he is s-~i I I in favor of tile Pl"'OJ5ct~ <br /> <br />Mayor 8Jorndahl jnfol~~ec.i -j-h3 co:.!rici! of iJ ia"j--for, datod June 18~ <br />196e, "from Violet j..,' DJ R8: 272 Chesi~nu'r S"h-eet, S-i-. Paul, owner of <br />property in the improvomon1" areo, WllO is opposed to the project. <br /> <br />.M.rs.. Oi F~e \',ras pcesen-r and vojc(~d hut"" ()PPos;t;crr~ ~:"l"ai'ir:g that her <br />property would derive no bensfit from this improvement. <br /> <br />There ~'H~S discussion by tho council~ ~,'~aycr Bjorncc!ll felt th{)t much <br />of the opposition sta.~cd 2"l" th1s mc()"ting so fnt.. concornod objections <br />to be raised a.~ the a5seS~;t18ni. !~c~0rirlg. <br /> <br />Counc i l man Ho II enhol~::,:;'i' ;YlC\:\:~'Cj c;:rJpi-'J\'8! or San i ..l(~H""/ Scp,tG;m J mprovement <br />No. 9D and authorized B2ni5~.Gr Etlgineering Co. to prepare plans and <br />SpeCi"fications.cnd bid ";:ol~;ns;^/..:(;;CrJr1(i0d bV CouncllrJCln Henderson; <br />moo"ion carr-lad. (}JLOA 'fli'-'~~ <br /> <br />~avor BJornctah I r~cquestGd f<l-~ Krann,-:;k to r"'"JmiIH,: <"~.i:~ counei I c.f the <br />axcava~ed dirt ~lai-1-er. <br /> <br />- L ~. <br />