Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JUNE 27, 2005 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />not have a negative impact to the rcsidential properties. He stated the lighting was not an issue <br />however. <br /> <br />CounciImember Holden stated if the lighting already met the Codes and with the additional <br />landscaping, she had a concern tl1at the building would not be seen from the road. Mr. Hellegers <br />replied there was a lot of landscaping, but the building would still be seen from certain angles, but <br />not nccessarily from the north. <br /> <br />CounciImember Larson stated this site had enormous potential given what would develop on the <br />northeast side and Planned Unit Development was a process of negotiation. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a Motion to <br />amend the previous Motion to add a condition as follows: "Rcplacement of the <br />EFIS with anotl1er higher quality building material consistent with our existing <br />design standards that still maintains the architectural distinctiveness of thc building <br />as proposed." <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she would vote no on this because she believed this was not the time or <br />place for this. <br /> <br />CounciImember Grant statcd he would also vote no on this because the only other alternativcs <br />would be stone, brick or glass and he believed they needed to discuss this further and to convey to <br />the Planning Commission the materials approved by the City Council. He noted Holiday Station <br />Stores wanted to maintain an image for their stores. <br /> <br />CounciImember Larson agreed that Holiday Station Stores wanted to maintain their image, but <br />the City also wantcd to maintain its image and they needed to enforce this. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski called tl1e question. <br /> <br />Motion on thc amendment failed 2-2 (Councilmember Grant and Mayor Aplikowski opposed). <br /> <br />CounciImember Grant asked if applicant would consider changing some of the pillars to brick. <br />Mr. Sacco replied they would do that if they could keep the EFIS. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a Motion to <br />amend his original motion as follows: Add Condition number 11 to rcad, "Add <br />brick surface to the two front pillars on the building." <br /> <br />Thc amcnded motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />The original motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers requested Council specifically approve Rcsolution No. 05-42. <br /> <br />7 <br />