Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JUNE 27, 2005 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve <br />Rcsolution 05-42, Holiday Station Stores, with the eleven conditions. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />B. Awardinl! ofthe 2005 Seal Coatinl! Bids <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated bids were received and opened from two (2) contractors for the project. Allied <br />Blacktop submitted the low bid with a total bid amount of$34,754.56. He noted the low bid was <br />approximately 7.6% lower than tl1c Engineer's estimate. He noted there was also an alternatc bid <br />with Allied Blacktop submitting also being the low bidder in the amount of $49,600.00, which <br />was approximately 5.3% lower than the Enginccr's estimate. <br /> <br />Hc recommended Council award the 2005 Seal Coating Project, including the alternative, to <br />Allied Blacktop for a total amount of$39,714.56. <br /> <br />CounciImember Grant asked what the alternate was. Mr. Brown replied it was Cummings Park <br />area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant requested a copy of what bid papers went out and what was produced. <br /> <br />MOTION: Coullcilmember Holden movcd and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to <br />award the 2005 Seal Coating and alternate to Allied Blacktop in the total amount <br />of$39,7l4.56. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />C. Citv Council Approval to Replace the City Hall Copier Machine <br /> <br />Mr. Siddiqui stated the lease on the City Hall copy machine was set to expire on July 26, 2005. <br />He recommended the Council authorize the purchase of Canon Image Rurmer 8070 from Canon <br />USA at a quoted price of$27,157.50 and return the leased copier. The account would also rcquire <br />a gencral fund budget amendment in the amount of$2,157.50. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated there were a number of pieces of information he would have like <br />to have seen, including the number of images over the life of the unit, what are tlle existing costs <br />versus the future costs, etc. He stated he would be voting no, but he believed this was a good <br />deal. He indicated the reason he was voting no was because there was insufficient information for <br />him to make a decision. He stated going forward, he would not vote in favor of proposals that <br />were missing kcy information. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden agreed, but noted thc staff had provided all of the information at a <br />previous Work Session where Councilmember Grant was not in attendance. Councilmember <br />Grant replied he did not realize that and he requested the Work Session information be sent to <br />him. <br /> <br />8 <br />