Laserfiche WebLink
3- <br />vote against the proposed acquisition , but now finds a different <br />proposal which he would like time to consider. Crichton moved <br />411 <br />that Council action be deferred to the Council meeting of <br />September 8, 1975. <br />Motion died for lack of a . second . <br />In discussion of maintenance of the acreage , if ac- <br />quired , Simon said this only presents a problem if area is open <br />to the public; area would then be policed in same way as other <br />publicly-used land . <br />After considerable discussion , Wingert moved , seconded <br />by Feyereisen , that Council reject the proposal ; recognizing it <br />is very laudable to preserve the area , but not convinced that <br />proposal is a needed change to the proposed and existing compre- <br />hensive planned use of this area . Motion carried unanimously . <br />411 Mr. J . Bussard stated that if a rezoning of his property <br />is proposed , he is violently against it . Council assured Mr. <br />Bussard that the zoning of his property would remain the same , <br />R- I residential . <br />1975 <br />Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes : April <br />A motion was made by K. Boss , seconded by C . Grudnoske , <br />that the Committee hold a public hearing to give the neighbor- <br />hood an opportunity to discuss the proposed purchase of property <br />south of Round Lake and use of land south of Round Lake . <br />May <br />The sub-committee for Round Lake County Park presented <br />a written report containing their views ( see attached ) . During a