CC 08-27-1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . Council Meetinp ~lnutes -1- August 21,1973 size was not questioned until now when a legal description of the R-B zoned portion of the parcel was r8Quested, and apparently found to be not available; the only method of detarminlnp Its size Is by scaling It from the Village zoning map. Crichton said, unless the entl~e comprehensive Village p'an warrants a change In zoning, he Is not In favor of rezoning parcels such as this. but because of the apparent confusion In this R-B description, he would favor this request In an effort to rectify the error. Mayor Crepeau agreed with Crichton's remarks. Herrick said he did not feel this request constituted nspot zoning". Hollenhorst moved, seconded by Olmen, that the Council approve the rezoning of the 2.62 acres, as described In the application presented with Case No. 13-28, from P-l to R-B. Motion carriad unanimously. Mr. Nordby assured the Council that the 6-acre R-~ zoned portion of the sits wi II be described and recorded as one parcel. 1974 Union Contract Crichton reported that the 1973 union contract has been signed. The union has advised that additional meetlnos will be needed for negotiat- ing of the 1974 contract; they are proposing additional Items for inclusion In the !974 contract. Hollenhorst advised he wi II be out of town the next two weeks and asked the Mayor to appoint someone to replace him on the negotiating committee. Mayor Crepeau appointed Stan Olmen as a member of the Union 49 Negotiating Committee. Crichton reminded the Council 01 the deadlIne to submit the 1914 signed contract; if no agreement is reached, It Is mandatory that the matter be resolved by an arbitration committe.. After discussion, the Council directed that B letter be written to Union 49 representatives expressing the Council's concern regarding time element, indecision and renegotiating from a new beginning with naw demands and asking them ~o justify this delay since they are re- quired by law to proceed in an orderly manner. REPORT OF COUNCIL~A" CHARLES CRIC~TON - Finance, Ordinance Review Fedor~i Revenue Sharlnq Crichton distributed cherts showing datos and Federal Revenue monies received, amounts reported to date (planned and actual usage), and the amounts anticipated thru 1974. After review of the proposed expenditures, Crichton suggested that ail of the !973 funds be spent for budgeted items, and moved th~t ihe Clerk Administrator be directed to transfer up to $36,661 (includ- ing the $10,512 authorized on June II, 19731 from the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund to the General Fund to cover all appropriate expendi- tures during 1913 in the following accounts: 4110-7900, 4110-5310, 4110-5320,4200-5300,4740-5300 and 47~O-5400. It is expressly under- stood that this action does not change the ~mounts budgeted In these accounts for 1973. Motion was seconded by Herrick and carried unan- Imously. Crichton moved tha~ the Clerk Administrator be directed to prepar~ and the Mayor authorIzed to 5ig~ the Foderal Planned Use Report covering Entitlement Period 4 (July I, 1973 throu9h June 30, 1974), showing the entire $30,043 05 ,Ianned for recreation capital expend- itures (501 for eoulpment - !96, and 501 for constructIon - 19~). This plan is :sn "Executive Propc>sal" as of August 27, 1973, and shall not be considered as binding on the preparation of the 1974 Vi 1.lage blld9~' The aval labi! Ity of these funds has no effect. on the Village __~_ reoulrements, but wil I help to prevent Increase In rate of a major t x. Motion was seconded by Hollenhorst and carried unanimously. -7-