My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 07-30-1973
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
CC 07-30-1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:34 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Vlllage Council Minutes <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />July 30, 1973 <br /> <br />This Is a liberalization of the variance provision of our Zoning <br />Ordinance, if the hardship arises because of special conditions <br />of the land. This is really not the case here. Mr. Hudalla's <br />hardship Is created by the expansion of his business. <br /> <br />Hollenhorst - I feel this expansion is not goIng to stop; all <br />Indications are that the districts are certain to grow. <br /> <br />Crichton moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that the Council concur <br />with the recommendations of the Board of Appeals and Planning <br />Commission to deny the request. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Case No. 73-7, Mrs. Farkas - lot Split <br /> <br />Hollenhorst reported that the Planning Commission recommends Council <br />approval of the lot split as depicted on the registered land survey, <br />requesting the 30' roadway declaration to be recorded with the regis- <br />tered land survey; all other subdivision requirements to be waived. <br /> <br />Hollenhorst moved, seconded by HerriCk, that the Council approve the <br />lot spilt as recommended by the Planning Commission. except that the <br />park dedication not be waived. <br /> <br />After discussion, Hollenhorst withdrew his motion and Herrick his <br />second. The matter was re-referred to the Planning Commission to <br />specifically state which ordinance requirements are recommended to <br />be waived and the reason for such t;lliver. <br /> <br />Bethel COlleqe - Old loq Church <br /> <br />The Councl I expressed no objection to the locating of an <br />"Old Log Church" on the Be~nef ~ampus, but requested that detailed <br />Information be submitted when applying for the permit to relocate <br />the structure. <br /> <br />Case No. 73-1. Bethel Colleqe - Lot Spilt <br /> <br />Hollenhorst reviewed a .Ietter from Attorney Lynden, dated July 23, 1973, <br />and moved, on Attorney Lynden's recommendation, that the Counci I, approve <br />Bethel College's request, subJect to Attorney Lynden's acceptance of <br />the non-use easements and covenants to be prepared by Mr. Warren East- <br />lund, attorney for Bethel College. The motion was seconded by Herrick <br />and carried unanimOUSly. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-f,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.