CC 04-09-1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, ,. Minutes of RogU!Of CouncIl Meeting P~gc TOUr" April 9, i973 I ~t w~s st~tGd th~t tho object of ~ppllcatlon for what the PIGnnlng ~>o approve.l the referral Is to get ~ proper Commission has recommended the Council ~~No. D'.=I, Btlthel College - Lot Spilt P.01io~horst described the lot spiot rsqo.~t and reported that the Pl:3nnlng Commission racoll!mollds approval In COl!lp~ lance with Planner Shetijar's report of March 20, to spilt the footage down the middle, bot~aan tho buildings; moving lot Ulne far enough so no variances are t"oqu I rod. Hoij!anhorst moved that the Coullcll concur with the Planning Commission's rocommandatlons, as outlined. Motion was seconded by Olmen. 4ItAfter discussion, the motion and second were wlthdr~wn. The Clerk was raques;tsd to notify BEly!'le! College to comply \11th the reconllllendatlons of tlla P!annlng CommissIon. The Council deferred actIon ont;H3 appll- c~tlon until Bethel Co!!ege 15 In compliance. g~~GNo. 73-2. Duane Long - Garaqe A~p"catlon for Variance Hoi!$nhorst reported that the Planning Commission recomm0nds Council IhHila! of tile garage vllrl8nce and the garage "door height variance, as Iroquested. After discussion, Crichton moved that P~annln9 Commlsslon~s Tocommendatlon. and carried un5nlmously. the Council concur with the Motion was seconded by Hollenhorst Me", Long asked If It would be posslbia to Docato tho garage Into the h I ai, ai.tachedtothe house, and lUll> adv I sed that I f he attaches. the garage to the hoyse, and does not encroach on the 40 foot front set- beck requirement, no variance would be nGoded, and the building permit eRn be issued by .the Building Inspector. g!.59 No. 73-9 ~ Pl'll!ltOl1'"- - Th.-eG S lj:1n App-LLS,all~1I!I HolIG"hor~t movod that tha Councl! concu~ ~Ith the Board of Appeals !lnd POllnnlllg Commhsloll recommendations to dlssapprO\fCl the t\110 signs propoSGd at Highway 96 and HIghwQY 10 CPermit No. 73-991. and Hamllne AV0r.~a at the north corn~r of the ?emtom property {Permit No. 73-98), The motion .as sacondsd by Oimen and carrlad unanImously. Ho ~ U 3I1hol'$;1" rl!lpo!"tad that the sign at ";"ho entrance to 1"1'18 Pemtom dcyelopment was r~comm&nded for Counciil approval by the Board of Appeals; nt;'i"ln9 "~hat It hOlS ;J! ready !:leafl orGc'(Gd at tlH! proposed ,. I te but I Ii obvious violation 01 the 25 foot s&tb~ck requirement. HI'. Hoij '0llho,"st reported '\"Hlt tho Phmning COlllllllssior. recommended ,.~,ti -"h1!l!! I ng of fila sign fo!" eroct l!'Ig the $ i gn bOlfore 2l perm I t had been g:~"cntf~':1.. AfTer discussion, Holianhorst .ov~d that ths Clerk notify Pamtom that the sign, sa er~Ctad. Is In violation of the sign ordlna~ce; requesting th8t dr~wlngs be submItted &s to how they propose to correct the sign so the Planning Commission call act proparijy on the application; request- f:<J "fha..... th~~rc;Q;}ici:.t~ '~~Lr8~'"~ing.s b(;~1 5ub;~i'{)'ut.\ tor P3anning Commissio,n acol1SicJerlltlOi! lit Its S:p.eelal Mec-tlng Ou! AprlU 11, or the sign Is to be ~rDffiovad. Th. motion was seconded by Ol~~n B~d ca~ri8d unanimOUSly. Case No. 73-18, Thomas Llnd~r6n - Varlanc~ Requests Hol~Gn~orst moved that the Council concur ~lth the Planning Commission's recommendatIon to approve ths garage variance, as requested, and to. appr?v8,the 6 foot fence proposed on th& south side of the prop~rtYI p0~mltting ext~nslon of the fence to the g~ke a~ f~r as permitted by tha DDpartm.nt of Natural Resources. MOYlan was s0conded by DUman and carried unanlmous!y. CocoaJl actlan on thG varl~nce request for the 6 foot fence along the north sid~ af the property ~as tabled until the adjacent neighbor can be consutijed r. the propos.'. -4-