CC 11-27-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . CouncIl MInutes -3- Nov. 27, 1972 OrdInance Draft - UtilIty Rates A~n~~nt Motion was made by Henderson, seconded by Olmen, that AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO TH~ ~UNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, A~ENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 49, 141 AND 153: PROVIDING A NEW BASIS FOR CALCULATING SEWER CHARGES ON NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. CHANGING BIllING DAT'~ ^ND PELINOUENCY PROVISIONS AND PERMITTING REDUCTION OF RATES OR SENIOR CITIZENS OR DISABLED. be Introduced by title. Motion carried unanImously. Motion was made by Henderson, seconded by Olmen, that AN ORQINANCE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO$. ~, 119 142 AND 154 BY ESTABLISHING StANDBY CHARGES CHANGING BILLI G AN 0 LINQU NCY PROVISIONS. ALTE IN HYDRA REM A RO I N NO PERMITTING WAIVER OF MIMIMU~ CHARGES FOR SENIO CI IZENS AN B D . CITIZENS, be Introduced by title. MotIon carried unanl~us y. The above two proposed ordinances were referred to Robert McNlesh for study. asking also that he consider the possIbIlIty of lImIting the reduction of rates provIsIon only to hardshIp cases. Public W~rks Reserve Fund Atty. Courtney revIewed his letter, dated November 27, 1972, and reported that Ordinance No. 81 permits use of the Public Works reserve fund for municipal water capital Improvements. Amendment to OrdinanceS Nos. 98 and 99 Atty. Courtney reported"that he Is working wIth Planner Dick Shetler on clarification of var"lous areas of Ordll1ancesNos. 98 and 99, that Mri,Shetler Is to, get 8 redraU to him fot,hh, review after whIch he will tl.l,rn It over to the PlannIng Comllllsslp(lf9.1" their December meeting. " COI,I"n<;llman HerrIck reqaluted, and the Cou!)ciF'<;:9Ilcur...d, thllt the ;',' ord,lnance draft b. ref~rred to the Perks ~~~ Re'cfreatlon Celllmltte. 111' '.- t.he saRle 1'1 me.' f/," Report/of VII ill!:!e EnClllleer Donald Lund AS!lesslIlents - Chvestu I k E~~fne!lr Lund rel/lewed Ms letter to the w-unelT, dated November 22, 197:z. .,The Chvutulkpr:operty 'Us outllll'le:al:ona mllp. The prope,rty I~pre!lently hndlocked. but a private r&,jild is being built near It. C9l1ncll'"an Olmen felt that If the land Orv.rCllld Is beIng fIlled, It wlllllhly become a usable property wIth need for utilities. The C~vestulk propepr, todate has been assessed for-trunk service only, and not for front lateral servIce. The property would be subject to a f ron l' foot assessment I n the tutu re If deve loped Into II res 1- dentlal lot. Councilman Herrick suggested that If Mr. Chvestulk feels the property Is totally unusable, that It be donated 1'1.> the Village, and that ai I assessments on It be abated. CouncIlman Henderson suggested Village purchase of It for the $200 Mr. ChvOllstulk stated he originally paid for It. . Mr. Ch."estuik asked that assessments on the' property be abated until such time that It becomes a usable lot. The Council agreed to again look over the ~roperty and to consIder the matter at the meetlhg of December II, 1972. ~y~sar~ddltlon Mr. Lund reviewed his letter, dated November 21, 1972; recommended a performance bond for the Bussard AdditIon In the amount of $69,181.25, and recommended approval of the final plat In accordance with conditions listed In his !etter. Atty. Courtney stated he will submit his report on the plat at the next Council meeting. providing he receives the certlflcete of tItle on the property from Mr. Bussard. -3- - ---