CC 07-31-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Counci! Msetlnp ~inutes -2- July31,1972 the proposed tower site, have given notice that if the tower Is located as prop05e0 they will vecate. He stated that It also Is not an asset to their site aesthetically. Mr. Schwab stated he has no objection to the tower, but feels It should be located In an area where it wll I not affeet already developed land. Mr. Schwab requested that the Councl i deny the request for the tower location 8S proposed. At~orney Memmer, represertlng ~Idwestern Relay Co., summarized his Interpretations of '~he Village Ordl.nance provisions and the desir- ability of this location ~or the tower; asking that the Council approve the proposed location. . Attorney Courtney advIsed that, by Ordlnance,~he Council must take actIon within 60 days after receiving the recommendations frOm the Planning Commission, unless the applicant agrees to waive the 50-day limitation for Council consideration. After discussion, Attorney ~emmer requested that the 50-day limitation be waived. Hol fenhorsf moved, seconded ~iY Henderson, that the matter .be t<lbled untll August 14, 1972~ motIon carried unanlmo~sly. REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY VINCENT P. COURTNEY ~~s Report - Proposed Dl~~Development Attorney Courtney ~evlewed his letter of July 25, 1972 regarding his meeting with representatives of the Dreyfus Corporation, recomlnend- In!, that the Coune! I authol-!:!:e the Vlllar'e engIneer and planner to consult with the Dreyfus C",rp. representatives regarding thtllr proposal. !'.ttorney Druk,representlng Dreyfus Corporation, requested that the 60-day time limitatiOn for Council consideration of the Dreyfus pro- posalbe walvedc,' to provide time for eonsu!tao'lon with the Village planner, Village engineer and Village P,,,rksa,,d Recreation Committee. Ho! lenhorst mOVed, s.Gconded by Henderson, that the consultations be . authorized, and. fhat.the metter be tabled until August 28, 1972, as requested; motion c;;rrled l,nanlmously. ProPEl ;.ty -E:aseme,nts Rap'ort : \1ate r imp rovementNo. 68-1 Attorney Courtn.s'i. revIewed his letter to theCoullcll, dated July 26, 1972. Ma"rter w.as tabled unt! I next Council meeting.' Copy of letter to be (liven to Councilman Herrick. ~cD6na I d end As 50C I ates Con tract - San i tar,! Sewe r Imp rovement 12-13 Attorney Courtney reviewed the arbitration matter. HenderSon moved, seconded by Holleohorst, that the Councl I accept the settlement in the amount of ~fl.750.00, and authorize payment to McDonald and Assoc. In this amount. ~"otlon carried unanimOUSly. , ~Icated StreEd's Inquiry - Mrs. hls!'I,!.€' O'Connor Attorney Courtney advlsed tha~ a dedication of streets by plat approval Is sufficient d.~lcatIDn; however, there Is no legal obligation on the part of the Vlllar)e to mainta!:l the streets. Clerk Administrator Strom~ulst was requested to advise Mrs. O'Connor .,"hat the Vlllaqe does not assume maintenance of streets, but, when streets are dedIcated to tho Vii lape In proper condition, the Village wi II malnta!n them. B~~~st '2!- Tax Abatement for Inoerson Park Attorney Courtney reviewed the County Board decision to again refuse the requested tax abatement; he therefore recommended that the Councl! table the matter; advising that the deed cannot be recorded until the taxes are paid, but that the Vlllagm has no direct Ilab!llty to pay the $708.30 In back taxBs resulting from the late transfer of title. Clerk Ad~lnl&trator was requested to keep the deed In a sa'e place and to consider havlnr the deed entered In the county auditor's records.