My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-25-1974
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
CC 11-25-1974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:46 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 2:59:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, . <br />.. <br /> <br />~1INUTES OF REGULAH COUNCIL t~EETING November 25, 1914 <br />Page two <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD LUND <br /> <br />Lift Station No.8 Specifications - Status Report <br />Lund referred Co~ncll to his letter of November 22, 1914, and advised <br />that the metering devices are not functioning at this station, and <br />Metro Sewer Board has requested these be replaced at their expense at <br />the time Lift Station up-grading project is done by the Vii lage. <br /> <br />Council questioned how MSB is determining sewer charge to the Village, <br />if this metering device Is not working, and whether meter was used <br />as a basis for sizing new pump to be installed. <br /> <br />Lund advised that pump size was based on size and nature of area to <br />be served by this station. <br /> <br />. It was the consensus of the Council that Lund proceed with the meter- <br />ing device installation, as described. <br /> <br />Lake Johanna Outlet <br />Lund referred Council to his I etter of I 1/25/14, In wh I ch he adv I ses <br />of a Ramsey County Report describing Lake Johanna as a storm water <br />storage area at 880.5, after completion of new outlet. Lund expressed <br />concern re this level, since problems have occurred In the past when <br />lake reached 879-880. . <br /> <br />After discussion, McNiesh was requested to invite the County Engineer <br />and Engineer for Rice Creek Watershed District, to discuss this and <br />other aspects of the matter at an early Counci I meeting. <br /> <br />Hunters Park - Harriet Avenue Specifications <br />Lund stated that it was his understanding that Harriet Avenue was to <br />be a 9-ton road, Instead of 1-ton as proposed by Dreyfus Corporation. <br /> <br />Lund recommended that Dreyfus construct a9-ton road, suggesting Council <br />grant compensaNon for the cost differen,tial if, In fact, a 7-ton road <br />was approved. <br /> <br />Crichton said that at several stages of the development procedure, he <br />had aSked Attorney Lynden if the road specifications for Harriet Avenue <br />be included in the required documentation (Special Use Permit, Develop- <br />.At! 'fl).!.. Agreemeni', etG.d...,..a.lHL:,,!.a;; to I d . tp~~J.I4- ~me ;cl~l!r:, }l..J~tp~_ '!:Ille <br />,I<{fj ~~ere appr9v~that If , r ~ ify~eer, <br />nd not a 9-ton road, he is "up-set". <br /> <br />, <br />Lund said nothing fs shown specifically fqr Harriet Avenue on the plans <br />he has received. <br /> <br />Wingert said he remembers that Harriet Avenue was to be built to speci- <br />fications of a State-aid Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson, Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld, stated he recal Is discussion of <br />an eventual State-aid road, but no definite determination for Dreyfus <br />to construct a 9-ton road at their expense. He said that the plans <br />submitted for the roadways for Hunters Park Mere not for 9-ton roads. <br /> <br />Feyereisen asked the difference in cost involved. Lund said this has <br />. not been determ i ned . <br /> <br />Crepeau said the City wants a 9-ton road on Harriet Avenue. Evidently <br />there Is a misunderstanding to be resolved. <br /> <br />After further discussion, Olson suggested that Dreyfus meet with the <br />Councl I to resolve the Harriet Avenue construction specifications re- <br />quirement. <br /> <br />Bussard Court - Re~lest for Relaase of 1m rovement Bond <br />Lund referred Council to his letter of II 25 74, advising of work pend- <br />Ing completion, and recommending release of the bond. Lund explained <br />that the sealcoating wi II be done in the spring of 1915. <br /> <br />After discu~slon, Crichton suggested that the developer be requested <br />to submit a letter to the Village, assuring Village that he accepts <br />the responsibi lity to satisfactorily complete neccessary work in con- <br />junction with sealcoating and the revision to manhole 62, if It Is <br /> <br />-2- - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.