Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Page foul"" <br /> <br />February II, 1974 <br /> <br />Case No. 73-48~ Pr~llmlnary Plat - Nursery HII I <br />Wingert reported that the Planning Commission recommends that, In the <br />best Interest of over-all planning In the area, the Council approve <br />Nursery Hili Preliminary Plat In accordance with Alternate 62 lstralght- <br />In street); Council to acquire easement on Christensen property for <br />construction of a temporary cui-do-sac. <br /> <br />In review of the plans, Mr. Breems was advised by the Council of the <br />park dedication requirement of 10% of the value of the undeveloped <br />land. Mr. Breems stated he would prefer that the Village construct <br />the street, sewer and water utilities; assessing costs to the properties. <br /> <br />After discussion, the Council deferred action until the Council meet- <br />Ing of February 25. Mr. Breems was asked to submit an approximation <br />of money Involved to construct the street and uti Iltles, and Mayor <br />Crepeau agreed to contact C. G. Rein re the proposed cul-de-sac ease- <br />ment on the property east of Nursery Hili. <br /> <br />Case No. 74-2. Carl Mohn - Variance <br />Wingert reported that the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission <br />recommend Council approval of the 2-foot sldeyard variance requested, <br />and moved that the Council concur; approving a 2-foot sldeyard, and <br />overall sldeyard variance, of 2 feet, as requested by Carl Mohn, at <br />3459 Siems Court. The motion was seconded by Feyerelsen and carried <br />unanimouSly. <br /> <br />Case No. 74-3, Dreyfus Interstate Development Corporation - SIQn <br />Variance <br />Wingert described the proposed sign to be located on the SWcorner <br />of Harriet and Lexington Avenues, advertising the Hunters Park develop- <br />ment, and moved that the Councl I concur with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation to approve the permit for the temporary sign, as re- <br />quested with Sign Permit Application No. 74-64; sign to be permitted <br />In this location for a periOd not to exceed 18 months from the date <br />of Issuance of the permit. Motion was seconded by Olmen and carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Uniform Bulldln~ Code and Building Permit Fees <br />Building Inspector Squires' memo of 1/28/74 was reviewed by the Council. <br />Squires said that, while no Council action Is necessary to adopt the <br />1973 U.l:l.C., because on January 16, 1974, the ~llnnesota Building Code <br />Division adopted the 1973 U.B.C. and as of that date It becomes the <br />mandatory code for al I municipalities, most cities are adopting it by <br />resolution. <br /> <br />Squires reviewed Building Permit Fees charged by Arden Hills, surround- <br />Ing Villages and the U.B.C. Fee Schedule (1970 & 1973); Indicating <br />that current fees charged by Arden HI lis are, in most cases, lower <br />than those charged In the other municipalities. Squires recommended <br />that the Council adopt Sec. 3~3 (a) and (b) of the 1973 U.B.C., and a <br />new schedule of fees for construction not covered by this section, <br />such as fances, driveways, demolition etc., with a minimum fee of <br />$5.00 for all Building Permits. <br /> <br />Squires was requested to supply Attorney Lynden with Information <br />necessary to bring Village ordinances up t~ date, as they relate to <br />the Building Code. Council action was def~rred until the next <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />Case No. 73-45, Surface Water Cont,ol - Status Re~ri <br />Wingert reported that questionnaires are stll I coming In, and tallies <br />have not been completed, but questionnaires IndIcate residents are In <br />favor of some sort of control of the lakes. Wingert advised that the <br />Planning Commission requests Council direction on how to proceed. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Councl I was that it has no objection to someone <br />querying the County and DNR re what they ~ould be Interested In doing <br />re regulations, but that no specific requests be made. It was the <br />Council's general opinion that, untl I the tal lies have been completed, <br />and the entire picture Is know, no specific actions re regulations <br />be requested. <br /> <br />-4- <br />