CC 12-27-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- . Minutes 0'1 Regular Counci I flfteet 1 np De ce mb e r 27, 1977 Pegs th rea as described; authorize issuance of the Building Permit, subject to: ! , Approval of the City Building Inspector, En(llneer and Attorney c' City Attorr,ey I s app rova I of reso I ut i on 0'1 the park dedication ~ . 3. Rece i pt of 3 landscape bon d in an amount to be determined by the City Planner. Motion carried unan i l~OUS I y, Community Comp rehens I v~ Plannino Fund Entitlement . Wingert referred COlJnci I to his memo 0'1 12/22/77 and ettached Community Grant Application dr,3ft. A fte r rev i ew an d discussion, Cri chton moved that Council authorize the City Planner to prepare the necessary documents, based on the memo and application prepared by Wingert, applying '1or a $4,085 grant. Motion was seconded JY Woodburn and carried unanimously. REPORT OF VILLAGE TREASURER DONALD LAMB Investments T r'easure;::-[ a mb reported the fo I I o~' i n g investments tota II i ng $585,000: !OO,OOO lor , month at 6.6% 1 150,000 for 3 months at 6.8% 185,000 for 6 months at 7.05% 150,000 for 9 months at 7. 15% Cr- i chton moved, seconded by Hanson, that Counci I ratify the investments as repo rte d by T reas u re r Lamb. f'.'ot i on carried unanimously. OTHER BUS'INESS Bu"sard Court Drainaqe Attorney Lippert rev' awed the chronological his to ry 0 f events re I ati ve to tr,e drainage on the Car I son lot ( Lot 10, Block I, Bussard Addition); requested the City to authorize Installation of the dra I nage pipe within -rhe dra I nage and ut i Ii ty e,osement between lots 9 and 10 ( 10' on ea ch lot) ; s-'ated it i s the City's obligation to red i fy the dral naqe matter; has -rempora r i I y called off orne restraining order, pending Counei I 's rGsolutlon of this matter, Hanson moved, seconded by Crepeau, that Counc i I authorize the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the drainage pipe installation project within the ut i Ii ty and drainage easement; de"elopar to reimburse Cfty fo~ costs estimated at $3,200, 'I n discussion, Cri ch--on and Winge rt eXJl ressed uncertainty that the Clty is responsible; '1'ge I the matter is between the developer and the lot owner; owner of land I s responsible for dra I na(!e on his 9 rope rty . ~!o"l or. did not carry (Hanson, Crepeau votinq in 1.avor of the motion; . Crichton, \4lngert, 'oJoodburn vot I n g in opposi ti on). Cr0peau and Hanson offered to meet with the developer to try to resolve the matter dLlrii1g the first week of J an u a ry . Lippert was asked if' his client .ould be I nte ,'ested In assuming one third of the $3,200 estimated project ~ost. Lippert said he prefers to have the matter r-eso I ved w; tl1 th,a Developer' as suggested; will contact the City on January 6th r'e outcome of the meeting, Park Dedication Sta;'ls :'leport " F I a he rty , s ArDen Bow I Crichton noted that the Flaherty Arden Bowi site encompasses three par ce Iso f land; queried whether' a I I th ree parcels sho'Jldbe subject to park dedication for the en I arged building and re qui re d park i n g . Council concurred that the parcel on which the existing buildin(! i s located shOuld be exemp7 trom park dedication; 10% pa,-" dedication tc be negotiated on the two parce I 5, ml nus the pond area, -3,. ____________..__m__