CC 10-11-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- . . Mlnuteso'i Regular Counei I ~leet i ng Oe;-ooer II, 1977 Page ten Attorney Lynden that contract matter is reso I ved. Motion carried unanimously. (Attorneys for Rexelsen and Malik to report their resoiutlon of the problem to Attorney Lynden.) Case No. 77-47, Banco Properties, inc. Ml I leI" explained that the Banco Properties proposed site is slightly enlarged from the plan originally submitted; referred Council to his report (9/28/77) and to the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting (10/4/771. Miller said he has no prob~em with defining the drive-in portion of the structure as an accessory usa for the bank; therefore a permitted use In the R-B zone. Mi IBer said the site is adequate for the potential expansion (second phase); not spacious beyond this point; . noted that the landscaping and grading plans have not been submitted to date; have asked that these be coordinated with Engineer's Harriet Avenue expenslon plans; landscape plans have not been prepared pend- Ing approval of the lot split. After review and discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Crichton, that Councl i app rove the lot sp~it and Building Permit for the North- western National Bank, subject to: I. Approval of the landscape plan for phase A (Banco Properties, inc. 10/77) ; 2. Coordination of p~ans with Engineer re acc~sse.s onto Harriet Avenue (Mutual Service & Northwestern Bank). 3. Satisfaction of park dedication. Motion carried unanimously. Temporary Facility - Banco Properties, Inc. Lynden advised that the Zoning Ordinance provides that Council may, In Its discrotlon, grant a temporary permit for use of temporary facili- ties as dwe! ling units for up to 90 days when an emergency or hardship situation exists; ordinance does not provide for a temporary permit for other structures; It would be stretching to apply the residential provision to the temporary bank facility. Lynden repor~ad that he requested P~anner Miller to canvas other com- munities re how temporary structures are handied; reports that several have an ordinance provision for temporary structures; one city requires a bond, or letter of credit, In amount of IOO~ of the cost of the oer- manent structure; some cities treat the request as an administrative matter. After discussion, Hanson moved to deny the temporary facility because there Is no ordinance provision and the temporary facility Is out of character and context in the downtown area of the City. Motion was seconded by Woodburn and carried unanimously. Status Report - Site Analysis, Village Hair/Public Works Building Miller reported he met with Councilman Woodburn, Bud Johansen, John Buckley and Charlotte McNlesh to obtain directive for preparation of the site analysis and future anticipated needs. Mi I leI" presented a preliminary anarysls to Counci i for its consideration and comments. In discussion, Miller noted that the analysis Is very preliminary at . this point; once required squars footags Is estabJlshed, site can be further evaluated; some concerns noted were: i. Does City propose to Increase or decrease services? 2. What Is the possibility of renting space for vehicle storage _ possibly In the arsenal? 3. Should Public Works and Parks be re-Iocated to an L-I zone? 4. Should old fIrs barn be eliminated or expanded? Miller estimated completion of the study before the end of the year; was advised to Include provision for an Arde~ Hills Police force for planning purposes. MetroDo~ltan Council A. Res onse rs Po ulatlon Estimates Cr cl1ton moved, seconded by OOdburn, thEt Councl I au'thorl ze the Clerk Administrator to sign and send letter, as proposed by Planner Mil ~er. Motion carried unanimously. -110- ----