CC 10-11-1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . M.lnutes of Regular Counci i Meeting October II, 1977 Page nine In discussion of drainage, it was sugg~sted that developer try to solve the matter by obtaining an easement from the owners of the property to the south. Cl'lchton moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council table the matter to permit the City Engineer time to study a method of drainage for the area and the developer to obtain approval of the drainage plan by Rice Creek Watershed District and to obtain approval from New Brighton for the sanitary sewer connectiOn. MotiOn carried unanimously. Case No. 77-27. Mutual Service - Grsdinq and Landscape Plan MI I leI" stated that Mutual Service is offering an idea of its plans, and asking for in-put; no action Is requested tonight. . Terry WObkln, Tom Lynch and Wayne Winsor (Wlnsor/Faricyl displayed a revised mOdel of the proposed site end indicated changes proposed In parking area and drainage ponds. It was noted that point in question is the 100' butter strip, between re51dentiai area of Hunters Park and the recently rezoned R-B portion of the Mutual Service site. Crichton moved, seconded by Woodburn, that the rezoning to R-B previously approved (7/11/77) Is as Indicated on Survey dated 9/15/77. Motion carried unanimously. Lynch reported that an EAW has been prepared for the Mutual Service site, to be submitted by the City. In discussion, it was noted that an EAW Is not mandatory for this project; not feasible for City Planner and Engineer to review the EAW to meet the October 12th monitor deadline. Mutual Service determined to not submit the EAW at this time since It is not mandatory. In discussion of revised site, Planner Mliler noted that when the road Is constructed, some loss of trees may result between the road and the revised parking lot configuration; will want to watch this. Christof- fersen noted that road ,wi II have a discharge point; asked that consid- eration be given to carrying this water to the pondlng area. lMutual Service anticipates presenting its rough grading plans for approval at the ~ovember 1st Planning Commission Meeting; Lynch described the proposed fllRlng on the site to be a "cut and fill" situation; wi II only haul In granular filti. Q..ase No._ 77-44. Pre! Imlnary Piat - Arc!enLake Knoll - Reuben SundberQ Miller reported that a 5-107 subdivision Is proposed for a portion of the 3-parcei spilt of the Buesing property; referred Council to his report of 9/27/77 and to Planning Commission Minutes of ij 0/4177. Mil leI" noted that the 5-lot proposal Is superior to a 3-lot approach with access onto Hamllne; existing hous~ is not located to the sub- division's best advantage. Miller presented a rough sketch of an optional pian, as discussed at the Planning Commission Meeting, which forces Lots R <1 5 to side on Hamllne Avenue and not give lot owners the prerogative of possibly siting the rear of the houses on Hamllne lnot consJdeiFed a good con- dition by the Planning Commission); atiso forces aCCD5S to the cui-de- . sac; existing house eouid either fall on lot ! or Lot 2. MI! leI" reportad that the P!annlng Commission's motion a ~ lows developer to decide; was shown a rough sketch of tne optional p~an at the Plan- ning ~ommlsslon Meeting. Attorney Lyndan reported that Mr. Malik advises that he had contracted with Mr. Buesing to purchase one of the three origInally proposed parcels, subject to approvai .of a 3-iot p~at by the City Council; c~alms he stll i has rights under Mis purchase agreement; noted that the City . doas not normaRUy get Involved In private conflicts. Mr. Malik presented his contract to the Council to review; said the property he is buyIng Is substantially the same as soUd ta Sundberg; apparently Rexelsen signed tWoO contracts. Woodbu rn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council hble its c.onslderation of the PrelimInary P!at of Arden Lake Knoll unti i Counc I i hea rsf rom -9- -----