Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. . <br /> <br />Minutes of Spacial COLlnei I Mec~ing <br />Page .i"f~:1-8~ <br /> <br />January 17, 1977 <br /> <br />2. Approv8i of rlans by Rice Creek Watershed Board of Managers, <br />3. Roco:1ci I ia-i-ion of park dedication, and <br />4. 0etarmlnation of landscape Performance Bond amount. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Case No. 76-43, Rezoning from R-I to R-2 - Skyline Builders <br />~red:und raferred Caunci: to his report and attached maps HI through <br />14, and raviewed tho Prel iminary Plat presented by Skyl ine Bui Iders <br />with their application for rezoning of the property from R-l to R-2. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fredlund reported that the Planning Commission recommends that the <br />easterly 300' of the property be retained in the R-! zone ano that <br />the baiance of the property be re-zoned to R-2. Fredlund noted that <br />a revised piat Is to be su~mitted for Planning Commlssion's review <br />and recommendations ta Counei I; revised plat to show access road <br />from County Road F entirely on the Skyline Builder~ property, and <br />to end In a cui-de-sac. simi lar to that indicated on map #3 of report. <br /> <br />Iln discussion, CI'ichton noi-ed i-ha';' he Is anxious for some appropriate <br />development of this property, but feels that It should be developed <br />as zoned; suggested a Planned Unit Deve'opment under the existing <br />zoning. <br /> <br />;n further discussion, Counci I was referred to a letter from Minnesota <br />Depar-tmen-i of Transportation re noise levels presently generated by <br />!-694 tra1fic and advising that the proposed plat wi II not qualify for <br />noise abatement under present legislative mandate. Counc! I expressed <br />concern re solutions to noise and drainage problems and re ownership <br />0'( the op,?n swamp area which is apparently pro osed to be dedicated <br />h,to.jhe Vi! lage. Counr;! I determi~d~ ',. way thet conditions <br />~ be pi <lcae! on the ,1flve i opmeni- ob I ems; . I I J . ~ <br />kbya Planned Uni"r Development. ' <br /> <br />Mrs. Alber~, 4090 Valentine Crest Road, presented a Petition to Counci I <br />contBining approximatoly 50 signatures, opposing the change in zoning. <br /> <br />Mr. Ghobrlal, 4100 Valentine Crest Road, expressed his concern that <br />rezoning would decrease the value of his property - wants zoning to <br />I-sma i n as 1 tis. <br /> <br />Crichton moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Councl f deny the re-zoning <br />from R-I to R-2. Motion carrieu unanimously. <br /> <br />(Counci i noted that at-ea ~be developed as a Planned Unit Develop- <br />men1. a) <br /> <br />Schedule <br />A. Case <br />8. Case <br />C. Case <br /> <br />of Public HearinQs: <br />'___,,_._~___,-......w..._ <br />No. 76-41, Special Use Permit for PUO - BanCon, lnc. <br />No. 77-2, Edqewater South Subdivision - MarOon Homes. <br />No. 77-4, KB~th Lake Estates Subdivision - Harstad-Eibensteiner <br /> <br />vloodburn moved, s~)condsd by Crichton. that Coullci I schedule publ ic <br />hearings before the Planning Commission as fol lows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Case No. 77-2 anc Case No. 77-4 on February I, 1977 at 8:00 p.m. <br />at 'rne Vi Ilage Hi''' I, and Case No. 76-41 011 Febi-uary 15, 1977 at <br />8:00 p.m_ at the Villa,'e Hail; a!! subject to receipt of required <br />docu~entntion in sufficient time to pubilsh Notice of Hearing. <br /> <br />Mo'~ion c~rriGd unanimous~y. <br /> <br />E...!.!!.!l-,i..'2!:......'{lllaqe Pr,:oD!"rty on_HiQhway 96 <br />Fredl'Jnd was authorized by Coullei I to proceed with preliminary plans <br />'(or site plan of Vi Ilage ::>roperty on HighNay 96, for Coullci! 's con-, <br />sidenl1-ion. <br /> <br />OTHER BUS H1ESS <br /> <br />Ram~e~ County le~gue <br />McNIGsh .as requested to check with Ramsay County League as to whether <br />f1elternaT0t1 membnr is an 9f$ct(~d of"ricial. <br /> <br />-3- <br />