CC 11-22-1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

u 1 . , Mi nutes of R"g;J I a r Ccunc i I Meeting November 22, 1976 Page two - Mr. Carlson, said that "things bre moving along"; an additional meeting may be necessary to work out details for resolving drainage over Mr. Carlson's lot. Review of Proposed Zoning Ordinance In Il discussion of the changes suggested by Attorney Lynden In his memo of 11/17/76, covering first three parts of the proposed ordi- nance, Counc i I concurred that attorney's recommendations should be accepted with following exceptions: 9. Section Iii ( 13) p. 1-4, delete "moals, ortl; leave In limitation "not exceeding flvo (5) pe rson s " . II. Section ill ( 17) p . 1-4, leave definition of "bu 1 k matoria.ls" as is. . 14. On p. 1-6, Lynden to rewrite definition of easement. 16. On p. 1-7, Lynden to rewrite definition of frontage. 20. Section III (65) p . 1-8. Delete definition of "lot". 21. Section III (70) p. 1-9. Leave IlS proposed. 29. Section III (76) p. 1-9. Leave as proposed. 31. Section ill (83) p. 1-10. Leave as proposed. 32. See Item 43. 34. Section III (96) p. I-II. Change definition of PUD to . "The development of a tract of land In a unified manner, pursuant to a development plan specifically approved by the City." 35. Section iii (97) p. I-It. Delete definition of "plot". 36. Section iii ( 108) p. 1-13. Delete definition of rlghts- of-way, private. 37. Section III ( 109) P . 1-13. Delete definition of Public Right-of-way and add definitions of streets, pathways, etc. 40. Section III ( 126) p. 1015. Change townhouse definition to "A slnQle family dwel ling which maintains private Ingress and egress, contains no Independent .dwell Ings above or below It and Is attached to other similar dwe III ngs . by a common wall. 43. Section IV R-l, p. 1-17. Delete this section on existing non-conforming uses. Lynden to re-do as part of "~on- conforming Uses and Structures" p, 4-24 and 25. Also use Lynden's recommendatlolls re definitions No. 85 and 86; delete definition No. 124 p. 1-14. In the discussion of PUD provisions It was noted that the attorney . should add a traffic factor to the Circulation Component, add grading and re-do Construction Order Component. Counc i I requested Lynden to check pages 4-15 to 4-23 and re-do as necessary. In the discussion of the Public Use District provisions, the possl- b II i ty of restricting the number of students per acre or us I ng the population component (p. 4-20) were exp I ored. I t \~as noted that difficulties could be encountered In applying standards where a public use facility Is located In two c:ltles. In the review of Tables 2-3 and 2-4, questions were raised relative to zoning for public use and whether these should be "permitted" or require special use permits. The possibility of establishing special pro- cedures for public use developments was discussed; COUIlC I t generally concurred that the Village should minimize number of procedures and use PUD procedures; this would require adding page 4-16, II st I ng uses In P-I District. Woodburn noted that proposed ordinance pro- vides that PUblic Hearings may be requ I red. Lynden recommended that -2-