CC 10-12-1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, ~inutes of Regular Council Meet j nIl October t 2 , 1976 Page three Pemtom North, First Addition - Street Acceptance Christoffersen advised that repairs have been made as outlined In his letter to Pemtom (9-13-76); recommends City acceptance at this time. Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that City Accept the street In Pemtom Townhouse Villages North, First Addition. Motion carried unan I mous I y. (Christoffersen noted that warranty begins on date of City acceptance of the street). County Road f Emprovement . Arden HI I Is/Shoravlew Agreement re County Road F Storm Piping Chr I stoffersen referred Counc II to proposed Agreement, and attached Drainage Boundary Map (Exhibit B), between Shorev I ew and Arden H I II s re storm drain Improvement (County Road F Improvement a portIon of Improvement P-SS-W-ST 75-1, S.A.D. 187 -I 0 I -0 I ) . Christoffersen noted that ~ttached map conforms with the Rice Creek Watershed Map, Indicating that approximately 65 acres wi II drain from Shorevlew Into Arden Hills (45 acres, north of County Road F # ~o ac res south of County Road F); 36 n pipe proposed will carry Shorevlew flow and drain the intersection. Crichton displayed a map of water areas, preparej by Rice Creek Watershed about two years ago. Ch r I stoffersen s~id that Shorevlew has not changed the direction of drainage i n rec~nt years and wll I not a II ow additional run-off to occur beyond acr~age shown on the map; Shorevlew wants assurance they can use the pipe I f they pay for the I r share. Christoffersen noted the following alternatives, as he sees It: I. Bull d storm sewer for Arden Hills only. 2. Build storm sewer for Arden Hills and Shoreview. 3. Don't build storm sewer at all. 4. Build larger storm sewer now and pursue drainage agreement with Shorevlew. In discussion, It was noted that approval from property owners should be obtained In order to Increase flow over property not owned by City. It was noted that whether culvert runs under F 01" under Lexington, length of easement across Reiling property is about the same. Christoffersen recommended that some type of dra n be Installed at the County Road F ILex I ngi"on Intersection; Shoraview has agreed to the C.A. financing method; should know this week what size pipe to Install. After discussion re costs of various sized pipe fnstallatdJons, Wood- 1 burn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Counc i I authorize the Instal- lation of the larger 36" pipe at Lexington and County Road F, as indicated by Engineer; Arden Hil Is to proceed with an agreement with Shorevlew In which they be Invited to participate In the cost of the Installation per paragraph 4 of IEnglneerJs letter of 10/4/76 when . downstream drainage to 1-694 is constructed, and to offer their part- Icipation at that time on the C.A. basis on drainage between 1-694 and County Road F. Motion carried unanimously. ~ ~_. - Is to con- " lit was noted that pipe should belnstafled and ~nglneer tinue working on an agreement with Shorevlew to resolve the downstream drainage from County Road F to i -694; not nacessury to actually have agreement signed before Installation of the plpe~) ~.S.P. Agreement and Reiling Easement that Counc II authorize execu- Crichton moved, second$d by Wingert, tlon of an Agreement with N.S.P. by the Clerk Administrator and Mayor, subject to approval by the Sngineer and Attorney. Motion carried unanimous Iy. It was noted that several attempts have been mCldt) by the City to contact Relll ng In an effort to obtain notarized signature on water main easement. Counc II dlr~cted The Engineer TO not delay the project. -3-