CC 10-13-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Minute. of aegular Council Meeting October 13, 1981 Wingert moved, aeconded by McAllister, that Council adopt ae.olu- tion No. 81-73. Motion carried unanimoualy (4-0) . Storm DrainaRe Improvement No. 81-2 Christoffersen reported that the contractor haa broken ground on the .torm drainage improvement; aUlgeated it wo.ld be appropriate to make application for 90% fundinl at this time, if council deairea. In discuaaion, the amount of funding to apply for waa queried, and whether exceaa funda, if any, can be applied to the Grey Fox aoad improvement. McNieah wa. aaked to obtain Bond Counael Popovich'. re.ponae re tranaferability of funda. Council concurred that Engineer apply for the entire amount, unleaa Popovich determinea exceaa ia no t tranaferable to Grey Fox load. . REPOIT OF VILLAGE PLANNEI OILYN MILLEI Caae No. 81-23, Final Plat of Arden Oaka Council waa referred to a tranaparency of the Unal plat which Miller reported conforma to the approved Preliminary Plat; noted that aU lota meet or exceed minimum area and dimenaional require- menta. Miller reported that the Planning Commiaaion recommenda approval of the final plat aubject to the four conditions liated in Minute. of 10-7-81; auggeated two additional conditional 5. Vac.tion of streets in Shady Oak plat. 6. Fi11ng of quit claim deed for roadway purposea for turn-around on lot 17. After review and discus.ion, McAllister moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council approve the final plat of Arden Oak. aubject to: 1. Approval of all eaaements (uti 11 ty, drainage and turn- around by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 2. lesolution of park dedication requirement. 3. Approval of proposed street names by the Poat Office. 4. Approval of atreets, utilitiea and Irading plans by City Engineer. 5. Vacation of certsin streeta in Shady Oaks plat. 6. Piling of appropriate deed for roadway purposea on lot 17, pur.uant to .Lynden I a recommendation. Motion carried unanimoualy (4-0) . It was also noted that the plat will not be executed until bida are awarded for the project. Case No. 81-28, Varisnce for Solid Six-foot Pence, 4542 and 4550 Pleasant Drive Council was referred to a tranaparency of the two subject lota ani surrounding area, and to recommendationa of Board of Appeala (l0- 3-81) and Planning Commiaaion (l0-7-81) . Applicants, Mr. Strunk and Kr. loe, were present and Mr. aoe ex- . p1ained that he was not aware of the ordinance requirement of 30% open fence, or the building permit requirement, prior to construc- tion of the atockade fence acress hia rear yard. loe explsined thet the, fence waa constructed to shield his property from the lights, noiae, recurring uae of right-of-way for aelling varioua thinga - vegetablea, cars etc.. and to acreen from weeda; sdd he has planted twenty trees to also help alleviate theae prob lems. Strunk said he has the aame situation, and would like to continue the solid fence across his rear yard; has no objection to a 30% open fence on the side yard extenaion of hia propoaed fence, which is in tended to pro~ect child from the pond on the adj acen t lot. Miller briefly reviewed hi. cO\ll1llenta in Planning Memo (9-29-81) , and reported that the Planning Commiasion ~elt very atrongly that the major and minor arteriala prOVide unique expoaure of an ex- tremely buay interaection for theae two lots. -3-