CC 06-08-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutea of Regular Council Meeting June 8, 1981 It waa atated by Leonard Grudnoake (land owner) tbat be feela tbb property baa paid ita "due" to tbe City; was cbanged fro. co..ercial to residentiel and back again to commerciel; would like tbe City to work with tbe developer to accomplisb tbis develop.ent w~icb aeems suitable for tbia site. . Wingert noted tbat a buffer is autually needed between tbe City'a property and tbe propoeed office developaent; agreea tbat tbe City ia probably not tbe aoat desirable neigbbor; Council accepta tbe fact tbat we ahould work togetber; suggested tbat tbe plan abould be considered witb tbe needs of tbe City and developer in .ind; atated that it appears tbe City needs 20' to 40' for truck .aneuv- ering and buffering (Johansen ae.o); feels a 20' setback would be acceptable to the City; tbe 75' setback would not be required if e land dedication ia required by the City; noted tbat if City takea 40', the site aay not provide for six buildinga, posaibly five on alightly larger lots. Hage noted tbat the alternate plan, presented tonight, is intended to ainiaize parking in tbe rear of the site; Hage aaid the proposed landscape plan provides tbe needed screening in the 50' to 60' area between the west building and property line. In discussion of land needed for City aaneuvering rooa and aain- tenance, it was noted that 20't ia indicated by Johan.en, if the alope between the properties is miniaized. Hage said 20' would not inpact on the six-lot developaent. It was noted that a landscape buffer is required between resid~~~~l.and co..ercial districts. A 20' land "swap" waa suggested,:i'fil~afflfaction of the park dedica- tion requirement, providing a 20' buffer between the B-1 and R-l; developer wou~d be responsible for the buffer area unless this responsibility is waived by tbe City; landscaping of the buffer to be in accordance witb an approved landscape plan. Council action regarding the Preliainary Plat was tabled until the nextLaeeting, pending tbe developer'. reaction to tbe auggested 20' wide buffer dedication and reaponse to traffic concerna. Case No. 81-17, A.ended Special Use Perait for Bethel ColleRe Killer explained that Betbel College haa re-atudied and aade ao.e changea in its proposed aouth ca.pus plan; since the campua ia currently under a Special Use Permit, an amendaent to thia per.it will be necessary to incorporate the up-dated Caapus Kaster Plan. Killer noted that basic approval of building locstions and usea is requested at tonigbt's .eeting; no building or grading plan approval at tbia time. . Dave Lissner (Bethel College) noted one change in tbe north campua portion of the plan, changing the propoaed expansion of the library; now propose two smaller additions (one library and one non-library). Lisaner explained that the roadway loop in the soutb campus is .ore precisely located than on the previous plan; all buildings were sbown before, but are now more precisely located. Lissner noted that the Betbel property west of Old Higbway 10 (approximately 7 acres) is not a part of the Special Use Permit; uaes shown on the previous plan were residential/atbletic fields; now propose atbletic field use (probably not reaidential); suggeated this would provide less impact on tbe City's park ayatem. Lisaner aaid tbe approximate 5-acre Betbel property (northwest corner of Old Highway 10 and County Road E2) probably will never be developed; want tbis for open apace. -5-