My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-13-1981
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC 04-13-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:02 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br /> <br />April 13, 1981 <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Crichton noted, that whether the assessment hearing is held before <br />or after award of bid is based on whether there are to be assess- <br />ments; One of the thoughts is that Arden Hills might want to take <br />the approach of a storm drainage improvement area which would be <br />a separate taxing district. <br /> <br />Lynden briefly reviewed Chapter 444 provisions re its possible <br />ramifications and the delay pending establishment of the district <br />by ordinance. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that a Special Council Meet- <br />ing be scheduled on Monday, April 20th at 7:30 p.m. to discuss <br />assessment procedures with Bond Consultant Peter Popovich. <br /> <br />In discussion of the four concerns raised by the Shoreview Council . <br />relative to the proposed Joint Powers Agreement, Johnson said he <br />would like to see a sketch of the flows from Island Lake and how <br />they impact Arden Hills; also queried point number 4 of Filla's <br />letter. <br /> <br />Christoffersen said he would prepare the Island Lake flow sketch; <br />noted that the New Horizon Homes Development (Cty. Rd. F, east of <br />Deluxe Check) does not substantially affect the total drainage <br />picture, but he will show it on a map. <br /> <br />In discussion of Bethel ditch capacity, Christoffersen said it <br />appears it will satisfactorily accommodate flows of 200 to 250 cfs. <br /> <br />Council discussed point number 3 relative to payment of costs <br />should .Arden Hills or Shoreview decide to abandon the project. <br />Council concurred to defer resolution of this matter to the April <br />20th meeting. <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLACE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSON <br /> <br />Improvement No. P-80-l, County Road E Resolution No. 81-23 <br />It was reported that the Attorney for McGuires may want some <br />changes in the proposed easement; wants indemnification, if an in- <br />jury should occur, compensation, and the area returned to its orig- <br />inal status at completion of the project. Lynden said the changes, <br />except for the compensation which Council concurred is not accept- <br />able, seem reasonable. if McGuires pays all costs for the changes <br />and the changed easement location is first approved by the city <br />engineer. <br /> <br />After review of the status of three other easements, not yet re- <br />ceived (Flahertys, Standard Oil and Carrolls), it was moved by <br />Woodburn, seconded by Hollenhorst, that Council adopt Resolution <br />No. 81-23, APPROVING PLANS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT <br />WITH NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY FOR PROJECT A IMPROVEMENT NO. <br />P-80-1. Motion carried (WOOdburn, HOllenhorst, Johnson, Crichton <br />voting in favor of the motion; McAl1ister voting in opPOSition). <br /> <br />Proposal re Maintenance of Traffic Signals at East and West <br />Ramps of T.H. 51 - MnDOT <br />Council was referred to letter from MnDOT (4-1-81) re proposed <br />maintenance of signal systems of the T.H. 51 east and west ramp <br />intersections. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After discussion, Woodburn agreed to contact MnDOT re the proposed <br />shared maintenance of the signal system and street lights and to <br />discuss the need for the west ramp signal. <br /> <br />Bid Award - Water Tower Painting <br />Council was referred to Christoffersen's letter of 4-9-81. reCOm- <br />mending award of bid to the 10w bidder. Al1ied Painting and Reno- <br />vating Inc. in the amount of the bid and denying the use of the <br />substitution. <br /> <br />After discussion. Hollenhorst moved, seconded by McAllister, that <br />Council award the bid to Allied Painting and Renovating Inc. at <br />$17.300 as per specifications. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.