CC 10-14-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting October 14. 1980 Page 4 aske d if Council has contacted o the r ci ties rega rding park maintenance and planning, A rn old Blomquist said we have a fine Council wi th pruden t fiscal judgement; for that, we commend you. B I 0 mq u i s t spoke in favor of re tain ing the Parks Director position and encouraged Council to use professionals when it is considered appropria,te in planning the parks. Helene Bass thanked Mr, Buckley for the park program de vel ope d in Arden Hi lls; note d that it reaches children of all ages and levels; feels the programs are of superior qualitv. The concensus from the discussion was that Council will work with . J01.ln,~ John ;lth the. Counc11~, ,(u~~W//t~fA!.kU a>-d!t. / .('-L ~C .' a...L/ 7U-<'.L-IZ4'~' 1../, (/ REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLY MILLER Case No. 80-37, Building Pe rmi t - Be the 1 College, Addition to Building B (Science Building), Counci 1 was referred to a transparency of the Be the 1 si te plan and to plans for the proposed 52 I x 105 ' th re e s to ry addition to Building B (Science Bldg,). Miller noted the addition is similar to pas t additions to other Be the 1 College buildings; it al te rs an existing turn-around somewhat and causes re-location of existing .1 an ds cap in g; noted that parking requirements are not an issue; reported tha t on-campus parking is being as s e sse d by Bethel as part of the proposed development of the south portion of the campus, Lissne r (Be the! College) referred Co unci 1 to his Ie t te r of 9-18-80 discribing the building addition and proposed use thereof. Arch- i te c t Richard Cottle explained that the roof line of the exis.ting science bUilding will be extended; addition will align with facade of adjacent building; exterior elevations were shown; exterior brick proposed will match that of the existing buildings. Lis sne r said the first floor of the addition will be utilized by the b io 10 gy departmen t including greenhouse; second floor will be for physics (labs, classrooms and offices) ; th i rd floo r wi 11 be psychology. _Lissne r sai d they would like the addition to be s e rvi ceab Ie by the fall of 1981. Mi lIe r reported that the Planning Commission re commends approval of issuance of the Building Permit, Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson. tha t Council approve issuing of the Building Permit for Building B as per plan da te d received 9-18-80, Motion carried unanimous ly, . Case No, 80-35, Building Permit - Manufacturing/Warehouse Build- ing J Eugene Colestock Mi lIe r referred Council to a transparency of a si te plan which the Planning Commission has arrived at and recommends to Council for approval; noted that the app 1 i can t does not concur wi th the 20 foo t park i n g and building setback as indicated - pre fe rs to align the new building with the existing building. Mi ller noted tha t . the building se tb ack as proposed is 50' from the Lexington Avenue righ t-of-way line; the parking/driveway area in f ron t of the b uild- requires a 20' variance. Mi lIe r reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the 5 ' sideyard setback variance fo r the parking area along the sou th property line but recommends a 20' setback of the driveway parking area in the fronF for landscaping, -4-