CC 10-14-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

------- Minutes of Regular Council ~lee ting Oc tobe r 14, 1980 Page 5 In discussion, it was noted that the side parking area, as p ro- posed, would be II free flow" between the two sites; app li can t wanta the buildings aligned for circulation reasons as well as appear- ance of the two similar buildings; if buildings are not aligned, the re will be a 20' jog for cars at the f ron t of the building. Gene Colesto% ~ded Council that when the original building was built 15Ayears ago,a plot plan was presented of the two build- ings; wants to now develop the building proposed 15 years ago; wants two buildings with identical appearance and wants them aligned. Colestock said he proposes to connect the two buildings by a walkway connecting the s e co n d stories; also proposes to conne c t the b ui ldings at the front by a decorative wall to give them the appearance of one building. . Colestock said he proposes to build the new building with face b rick and then do the same to the original bui Iding; has not de t e r- mined the exact b ri ck , but is considering a mauve-colored b ri ck at present. In review of past e co J:ds ' i twas n te~~~M the 20' ~ s cape d area was e~s e. Colestock said the I wide landsc ed area was n ver discussed when original building was b ui It; was not aware of the requirement, Af te r discussion, Wingert moved. seconded by Hanson tha t Council app rove issuan ce of a Building Pe rmi t for the warehouse/manufact- uring building including the 5 f 00 t parking area setback variance along the sou t h property line, with the following contingencies: 1. Addition of face b ri ck to building facade, eas t elevation, at time building is b ui 1 t. 2, Drain age and grading approval by the Ci ty Engineer. 3. Drainage approval by Rice Creek Watershed, 4. Landscaping and exterior lighting plan approval by City Planner prior to building occupancy. 5 , ~ Acceptable . . of park dedication prior to building occupancy, 6, Submission of detailed plan s for bridge, including e le va t ion and construction details. In further discussion it was noted that the motion requires the building and front parking/ d ri veway a rea to be re-sited 20 feet to the . wes to Architect said tha t the plans are in the preliminary stages at present; would pre fer approval of the building si ze and location at this time and de fer acceptance of the exterior treatment until plans have been developed; we'd like approval of the building and setbacks as requested. . Wingert withdrew his motion and Hans on his second. Wingert moved, se conded by Woodburn, that. Council app rove the 5' f ron t se tb ack variance on the south and disapprove the 20 ' f r on t setback variance on the eas t for parking, In discussion, Win ge rt explained that the denial of the 20' setback is based on lack of a hardship for gran ti ng the variance, Hsnson said, as long as the buildings are tied together, the 20 ' f ron t setback varian ce does not bother him, -5-