CC 07-14-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 't Minutes of Regular Council Keeting Page Four July l4, 1980 McClung explained that the terrain is difficult; noted that lot areas are to standa.d, except Lot 3; asked approval of the Preliminary Plat with the lot width variances ,because most of the lot depths exceed 110' re4uirement.' In discussion, it was suggested that the front setback be at the 95' point on each lot. Miller noted that Lots 6, 7 and S present a grade problem if setback line is moved back. Concern was expressed relative to number of lots under the required 95' width. McClung requested Council to defer action until a later meeting at which time he will submit a plat revision. (McClung will contact Clerk Administrator when amended plat is ready for Council's further consideration). Case No. SO-18, Special Use Permit for Two-Family Residence, IS95 West County Road D Council was referred to a transparency indicating the location and size of lot. Miller noted that in this R-2 District, a 2S,OOO sq. ft. lot would be required to construct a two-family residence; explained that the proposed alteT~tions of this existing house are internal only in order to provide separate living quarters for the applicant's daughter and two children. In discussion, it was noted that the family is already living in the house and Skjelstad described the proposed conversion of the house interior into two separate living quarters, one of which would be SOO sq. ft. and the other 700 sq. ft. (not including the basement which would be shared). Miller noted that "granny flats" or "mother- in-law" apartments are gaining in popularity; reported that the Plan- ning Commission recommends approval, AS long as it is occupied by family members. . After discussion, Woodbul."n moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the Special Use Permit for internal alteration of the house at lS95 West County Road D into two dwelling units provided: 1. No change is made in the number of exterior doors, and 2. The two dwelling units remain only as long as members living in the house are reLated. Motion carried (WOOdburn, Uanson, Crichton, CEepeau voting in favor of the Motion; Wingert voting in opposition). Case No. 80-21, Building Permit for Two Temporary Modular Office Buildiugs at Control Data Corporation (Crichton left the meeting during the presentation and Council vote on this application). Council was referred to Planner's Report of 6/24/S0 and transparencies of attachmen~s thereto and to the Planning Commission's recommendations (Blsllt.s of 1/2/S0). Miller explained that since the proposed temporary modules are attached to the existing structure, it has been determined that the application is fOE a Building Permit. John Pearson (eDe) explained that the temporary structures are p~o- posed to be utilized over a 3-year period while the interior of the portions of the existing buildings sre remodelled. Bostrum (CDC) indicated the actual proposed locations of the modules on the site; explain~d that the specific locations are considered best for CDC's ease of operation as well as access for employees from the parking areas. Elevations of the structures were ~hown as they will relate to the existing buildings. It was explained that the exterior of the modules will match the color of the CDe building, with shingled mansard roofs. Slides we~e shown of temporary structures at the CDe Bloomington facility. -4-