My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-30-1980
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CC 06-30-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:04 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 4:10:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of Regular CouDcil Meeting <br />Page T"TO <br /> <br />June 30, 1980 <br /> <br />Va~ation of Righ~of-\~- Lake Johanna Blvd/Snelling Avenue <br />Lynden referred Ccuncil to his letter of-6/27/80 and attached <br />Resolution. <br /> <br />Woodburn moved, seconded by Crichton, that Council adopt Resolution <br />No. 80-36, A RESOLUTION VACATING PORTIONS OF STATE TRUNK HIGH~AY <br />NO. 51 RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING EASTERLY OF RIDGEWOOD ROAD, WESTERLY OF <br />SNELLING AVENUE, AND SOUTHERLY OF LAKE JOHANNA BO~LEVARD AND U.S. <br />HIGHWAY NO. 10. Motion carried unanimously, <br /> <br />Municipal Subdivision Act of 1980, Laws 1980, Chapter 566 <br />Council waa referred ta Lynden's letter of 6/24/80 re Municipal <br />Subdivision Act of 1980. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11> review, Lynden explained that when a developer of a commercial <br />or industrial development divides his lsnd into parcels which are <br />five acres or more in size, municipal subdivision regulations can- <br />n~t control the development. Lynden noted that residential sub- ' <br />divisions which are 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in <br />width arc also excepted, Lynden further explain.dthat storm water <br />drainage and holding areas and ponds are now classified as facilities <br />similar to streets, roads, sewers, etc. for which cash in lieu of <br />dedi~..tion __i--s not available; cash in lieu of dedication is now' solely <br />applicable to parks, playgrounds, trails or open space. <br /> <br />In further review, Lynden noted that par.cels 2~ acres or less in <br />size may be subdivided by means of a "survey"; large parcels by <br />"p lat ting". <br /> <br />Lynden noted that the regulations_become effective August 1, 1980, <br />unless otherwise indicated; suggested City consumate pending pa~k <br />dedications prior to that: eate, if possible. <br /> <br />Street Easement - Shorewood Drive <br />Lynden reported that there is no compelling reason to pursue an <br />"Easement"; feels, since it's torrans property, ownership is su1>ject <br />to existing roads; only reason to obtain an easement would be to <br />legally describe the road right-of-way, (Resolve width and location <br />of. ~ight-of-way). <br /> <br />Hanson noted that Presbyterian Homes contends that the road Is <br />located on their original site, not the recently acquired Sutton <br />Place parcel; residents on Shorewood Drive are concerned re <br />continued access to their properties, <br /> <br />Lynden suggested that a land survey may be in order to determine <br />road location; also to determine whether Sutton Place property, as <br />well 85 original Presbyterian llomes site is torrens property, <br /> <br />Christoffersen was requested by Council to try to locate property <br />irons of lots abutting the roadway (Johanna Narrows) and provide <br />a description of roadway for the next meeting. <br /> <br />RSPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN <br /> <br />. Feasibility Report - County Road L Improvement No, 80-1 and <br />Resolution N~, 80-35 <br />iG:nso~' moved, seconded by Crichtorl, that Council approve Resolution <br />No. 80-35, receive the Feasibilitv Report of Proposed County Road <br />E Improvement P80-1 and schedule the Public Hearing on July 28th <br />at 8;00 p,rn. at the Village Hall. Motion carried unanimously, <br /> <br />Cbristoffersen noted that the Feasibility Report does not include <br />easement or fiscal costs. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that 5% be added for fiscal <br />costs. <br /> <br />19~0 Sealcoating Bids <br />Christoffersen referred Council to his letter of 6/30/80, and <br />attached bid tabulation; recommended that Council award the bid <br />to the low bidder, <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.