Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />April <br /> <br />~.., <br />1.:..1, <br /> <br />1992 <br /> <br />The following comments\questions were received from the <br />audience: <br /> <br />Rollin West, 1150 Tiller Lane: <br /> <br />I~ favor of the project. <br /> <br />Gene Ward. 1242 Tiller Lane: Should consider doing the <br />project next year. Dunlap and West Round Lake Road are in <br />worse need of repair. <br /> <br />Gene Novax, 1190 Tiller Lane: <br />t~:..is year. <br /> <br />In favor of doing project <br /> <br />Ray Hjort, 1151 Tiller Lane: Tiller Lane has been in bad <br />condition for many years and should be redone now. <br /> <br />Robert Emery, 1:38 Tiller Lane: In favor of doing project <br />now; it won't get any cheaper to do later. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Betty Farr. 3327 North Dunlap: Not in favor of the project. <br />Does the April :5 letter to residents represent the low bid? <br />If so, why is the assessment amount the same as estiwated at <br />the February public hearing? <br /> <br />Maurer explained that residents were presented with <br />estimated figures at the February public hearing. At that <br />time, the project was amended which raised those estimates. <br />The lowest bid recently received was 17% less than the <br />amended estimate, the final ~esult was that the assessment <br />amounts, as reflected in the April 15 letter, are very close <br />to the amounts presented in February. <br /> <br />Wayne Bond, 1326 Tiller Lane: It appears there are two <br />separate groups of residents here tonight - those from t~e <br />upper portion of Tiller Lane who generally support the <br />project and those from the lower portion of the street who <br />generally do not support the project. Perhaps upper Tiller <br />Lane could be completely reconstructed and lower Tiller Lane <br />just over! ayed. <br /> <br />Carl Nordquist, 1171 Tiller Lane: In favor of the project. <br />How will driveway aprons be handled? Will the assessment <br />=igures provided in the April 15 letter be subject to <br />chan.;;e? <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Maurer explained that the typical driveway apron goes four <br />feet up the resident's driveway and is matched as well as <br />possible with the existing driveway surface. Maurer and <br />Mayor Sather explained that if Council adopts the assessment <br />roll, upon which the April 15 letter was based, there will <br />be no changes to the assessment amounts. Sather assured <br />that if there is a cost overrun, only the City cost <br />participation will be affected. <br />