CC 08-08-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting August 8, 1983 Page Th ree . drive; existing island Is 16' from west drive; proposed island Is 60+ feet from the servIce bay; feels the pump Island wi II not be an encroachment on traffic flow; noted that the timing of high use of the service bays Is not normally at the time of high use of the pumps. Hicks moved, seconded-by MeAl lister, that Council approve the Amoco Station site plan with the additional pump Island as proposed. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 83-15A, Lot Spilt and Site Plan Review, Woodbrld~ePropertles. Phases II and II I Copies of the revised lot spilt plan (8-8-83) were reviewed by Counci I. Miller explained that the split, as proposed, wI II essentially equalize parking on the Phase II and Phase III lots. Miller referred Council to areas of Planning Com- mission concern and dIscussion: - access to Pine Tree Drive, - location of trash enclosure, Bldg. I II. MIller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan for Phases II and I I I, subject to applicants response to a re-deslgn of the entrance drive at Pine Tree DrIve and relocation of the trash enclosure, which currently Is proposed In the front setback of the Phase I II bui Idlng. Miller reviewed the recommended condItIons of approval, which reflect the same requirements as for Phase I. David WeIr, G~ry Vogel, Scott de Lambert and Eric Nesset were present. A modified site plan was presented which Incorporated a re-deslgn of the Pine Tree Drive dIvided entry, providing a longer Island divider. Vogel noted that the traffIc approaching the exit from the site Is controlled by a "Stop" sign from the north and from the south; noted that the entrance modIficatIons, and trash enclosure relocation reduce the number of parkIng spaces by about 6. Vogel noted that the trash enclosure has been relocated and Incorporated In the Phase I, Building A enclosure. In discussion, the height of the apartments to the south and McGuIre's motel were estimated at 35' and 40'+ respectively. It was noted that cross easements wll I be needed over the three-phase site relative to trash enclosures (Phase I I I and Phase I), parking (Phases II and I II and Phase I - A and B), pond, roads, uti Ilties, etc. (al I Phases) and should be fl led with the City. It was noted that even sma I I changes In the site plan, after approval, should be reported to Council. Vogel described the detention basin, which he said wll I be constructed with Phase I; noted that a baffled weIr wi II al low It to drain without overburdening the line In Pine Tree Drive. In discussion. Christoffersen suggested that a water loop connection be considered (Vogel said It wi II be looped); noted that because utilities are to serve more than one owner, some agreement wll I be needed for maintenance and repairs; suggested an association type agreement as In the townhouse villages. . Hicks moved that Council approve the lot spilt Into Parcels 3A and 3B (dated 8-8-83) and the modified site plan of Phases II and III (dated 8-8-83), SUbJect to the followIng: I. Slgnage Plan approved by Planning Commission and Councl I. 2. Site utilities plan approved by City Engineer. 3. Grading and drainage plan approved by City Engineer. 4. Landscape Plan approved by City Planner. 5. Plan approved by Fire Chief. 6. Lighting and screening to be consistent with Phase I. 7. Cross-easements for parkIng, road, uti Iltles, detention pond to be recorded with the City prior to building occupancy. 8. Resolution of park dedication prior to buIlding occupancy. Motion was seconded by Christiansen and carried unanimously. (5-0>' Ordinance No. 229. Adoptln~ by Reference the Uniform Fire Code - Final Readln~ -, Councl ~~_lil r:e~er d to Planning memo (8-4-83) relative to recommended districts In whlc" and combustible liquids should be prohibited;' In which bulk plants for f aV Ie and combustIble lIquids should be prohibited., Miller noted -3-