Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />January 31, 1982 <br />Page Six <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Report on Metro Council Hearing - New Brighton Interceptor <br />Christoffersen reported that the amendments to the plan are under <br />consideration; final decision On the New Brighton interceptor <br />should be known On March 9th. <br /> <br />Vaughan Park Easement - Motorola Tower Site <br />Council was referred to Christoffersen's amended map of the <br />Vaughan Park Easement which was drawn in accordance with certi- <br />fied survey. Christoffersen noted that as drawn, park is about <br />.04 acres short of the 10% dedication. <br /> <br />Council concurred to accept the park easement (Motorola Tower <br />site) as per amended drawing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE TREASURER DONALD LAMB <br /> <br />Investments <br />1-17-83 - $100,000 at First Federal for 6 mos. <br />@ 8.50% interest, maturing 7-18-83. <br /> <br />1-17-83 - $206,635.42 at Twin City City Federal for 3 mos. <br />@ 8.10%, maturing 4-18-83. <br /> <br />1-21-83 - $1,202,902.63 at First Federal for 6 mos. <br />@ 8.85%, maturing 7-25-83. <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council ratify the Trea- <br />surer's report. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Ordinance Interpretation re Amusement Devices at Colleges <br />Council was referred to Zehm's memo of 1-21-83 <br /> <br />After discussion, Council concurred that the amusement devices are <br />intended to serve students and are not open to ~public~ use;there- <br />fore, an arcade license is not required, but the individual amuse- <br />ment devices license shall be requ~r,d. <br />&v tUtM./c.Ul tl.fl,&.,,~1U -l}tu~ <':UuL ~~WL 6i5{ / <br />Attorney's Opinion ~ Social Gambling <br />Council was referred to Lynden's letter of 1-17-83 re Opinion Re- <br />garding Social Gambling, and to letter from Flaherty's requesting <br />a determination on whether the type of gambling described is allow- <br />able by law, or not. <br /> <br />After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council <br />concurs that the activity described constitutes ~a bet~ as defined <br />in Section 609.75, subd. 2, therefore, is not allowable by law. <br />Motion carried (Hicks, McAllister, Woodburn, Christiansen voting <br />in favor of the motion; Mulcahy voting in opposition). (4-1). <br /> <br />Report on Finance Committee and Fire Board Meetings - Councilman <br />Christiansen <br />Christiansen reported that Shoreview feels there is a need for an <br />additional fire station to serve the north; are concerned that an <br />additional station will be needed soon; want to select a site <br />while land is still available. Christiansen reported that he sug- ... <br />gested a site close to Lexington Ave.' for secondary access to the <br />south. <br /> <br />Christiansen reported that an additional bay is also proposed for <br />Station #1, snd reported that a new pumper truck has been pur- <br />chased. It was noted that the additional station costs are appar- <br />ently costs to cities, over the Fire Contract. <br /> <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br /> <br />Mulcahy reported he will not be able to attend the February Human <br />Rights Commission and Parks meetings. <br /> <br />-Hicks will attend the Parks meeting <br />-Woodburn will attend Human Rights Commission meeting <br /> <br />-6- <br />