My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-11-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-11-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 4:41:27 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 4:37:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JULY 14, 2025 9 <br />Councilmember Holden asked if we will get more information to determine if we want to take it <br />off the list. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would like more clarification about why this use is there. <br />Councilmember Weber said it exists now. This isn't a change. <br />City Administrator Jagoe will verify if there are any existing in the City today. <br />Council discussion moved to the accessory uses on the table. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said she still has the feedback from Council's previous discussion <br />regarding Home Occupation, Class I and Class 2. That one will come back. <br />Councilmember Holden asked what Day care, group or family means. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said they would not be allowed as an accessory use to something else. <br />All accessory uses need to have a principal use first. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if a manufacturing company could put in a daycare like Land O <br />Lakes has. <br />City Administrator Jagoe replied if you're a Manufacturing and Processing, Class I and you <br />wanted to do a family daycare of 10 or less, you can't. That accessory use is not allowed in the <br />Industrial Districts. <br />Councilmember Holden said she has an issue with a major business not being allowed to have a <br />daycare center for their employees. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if Land O Lakes built today and wanted to put in New <br />Horizons, they wouldn't be able to? <br />City Administrator Jagoe said it's part of the PUD. The daycare is open to the public, not just <br />Land O Lakes employees. It is a stand-alone principal use. There is two uses going on there. <br />There is a PUD for the two uses on the one site. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said that recently changed when they came in and did that sign. <br />Before it was strictly for Land O Lakes employees. Boston Scientific also has a daycare strictly <br />for Boston Scientific employees. She is not in favor of restricting other businesses from <br />developing their own daycare. <br />City Administrator Jagoe summarized she is hearing Council say to look at the ordinance <br />language so if a business wants a daycare within their facility, servicing just their employees, we <br />want to find a mechanism to allow that. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if that would cover churches, too? <br />Discussion ensued regarding churches and colleges that have daycare facilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.