My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-01-1982
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />opening and it's sort of like when two people are walking at <br />each other - first they both move this way, then that way - <br />you both start out onto the street and the~ have to stop because <br />both of you are trying to get out there and go to the south <br />area there. It really does create a problem and then you <br />complicate it by doubling that traffic coming there. I think <br />that's something you really have to take a look at because <br />that really does create a problem going through there, if that <br />street comes around through there. Also, if that occurs, at <br />what point do you have to widen Floral Drive or improve Floral <br />Drive? I assume if that happens, then that assessment would <br />immediately come back onto our citizens along Floral Drive. <br />We're talking about that street being on the developer (in- <br />audible) . <br /> <br />MR. GREGORY QUARFOTH, 1397 Indian Oaks Court: I have <br />two small children too, but to me the primary safety issue is <br />still the intersection on Floral Drive and Hamline. TO me, <br />there is seclusion in the park, but it is a park, not a play- <br />ground. I like the seclusion. I just don't think that Floral <br />and Hamline will take that kind of traffic flow and I just <br />don't think you can bank on the State saying they'll put a <br />stop sign up there. I also agree that the traffic problem on <br />Colleen is bad. I think there should be a stop sign or some- <br />thing there to help traffic flow along there. But I still <br />think the primary safety issue is at Floral Drive and Hamline. <br />It ',s more likely I'll have an accident and kill one of my <br />kids there than they'll be hurt in the park. <br /> <br />MR. MICHAEL OLSON, 4107 Gale Circle: First of all, I'd <br />like to know why putting a road through a park makes it safer. <br />The second thing, has somebody looked at the possibility of <br />a three way stop up at Colleen? At least they'd get a chance <br />to legally get out on Hamline. The other thing it would do is <br />slow down Hamline. Nobody goes 45 miles an hour on Hamline. <br />That 55 miles an hour from Snelling goes right to 96. It did <br />wonders at F and Lexington. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I guess I really can't comment on <br />that. County Road F and Lexington is a four way stop. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: That's where $80,000 worth of semaphores <br />went in. <br /> <br />MR. OLSON: Well, it helped. <br /> <br />MRS. UDAGER, 4255 Norma: You said no bike riding on <br />Hamline - how do you get out of Briarknoll and that area if <br />you can't ride your bike across? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: As far as a stop sign on Hamline <br />Avenue, I'd just have to take that under consideration and <br />make recommendations back to the Council. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: What does it do to the speed? <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.