My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-01-1982
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
CC 02-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Under the Arden Hills code having to <br />do with subdivisions, under the statement on cul-de-sacs, the <br />maximum length for cul-de-sac streets shal;L be 500 feet, <br />measured along the centerline of the intersection of origin to <br />the end of right-of-way unless there are 18 or less lots <br />abutting the cul-de-sac. Each cul-de-sac shall be provided <br />at the closed end with a turn-around having an outside total <br />diameter of at least 100 feet and a street/property line <br />diameter of at least 120 feet. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: So this, in fact, is longer than the 500 <br />feet to the right-of-way that is normally prescribed? In the <br />past, have you deviated within the village of Arden Hills from <br />that ordinance? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Not under that ordinance,. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: Isn't Floral Drive (inaudible)? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Floral was there before the ordinance. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: There are deviations, depending on how <br />you look at it. In other words, two outstanding deviations <br />are right here (inaudible) except there we built fire lanes <br />between so they're not true cul-de-sacs. There may be one or <br />two 'others since this ordinance was passed. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: When was that passed? <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Perhaps I should correct myself. I <br />said since that ordinance was passed - that provision has been <br />in at least two zoning ordinances that I know of. I don't <br />know when the first one was passed. It was more than six years <br />ago. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: On~ of the issues from the report from <br />the consultant did state that final decision regarding the <br />connection will probably rest with the cost of the connection, <br />the desirability of eliminating two cul-de-sacs, desirability <br />of providing alternate access for convenience and emergencies <br />and the impact on existing plots. I think there he is implying <br />that the fact that this plan to not connect it through would <br />give the two long cul-de-sacs. I think that's an issue here, <br />where there's a safety issue of access for the fire equipment <br />and for emergency vehicles to get into the new development <br />and also actually providing better alternate access to Floral <br />Drive, should there be a problem on Hamline. <br /> <br />MR. JOHN MINER, 4126 Norma Circle: When will you vote <br />on this? You're discussing this tonight. Does this come up <br />for a vote at the next Council meeting? <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: It would be up to the Council to deter- <br />mine tonight. They could vote on it tonight or they can <br />postpone it for quite a long period of time. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.